Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix issues with Windows package workflow #412

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 30, 2024

Conversation

patowen
Copy link
Collaborator

@patowen patowen commented Jun 29, 2024

An update to the shaderc-sys crate from 0.7 to 0.8 added a requirement to be able to view the vk.xml file to gather information about the installed version of Vulkan. To fix the workflow, we need to include that file in the list of files being extracted.

In addition, the cache action was upgraded from v2 to v4 because the old one was broken with errors like the following:

C:/VulkanSDK/1.3.231.1/: Can't create '\\\\?\\C:\\VulkanSDK\\1.3.231.1'

An update to the shaderc-sys crate from 0.7 to 0.8 added a requirement
to be able to view the vk.xml file to gather information about the
installed version of Vulkan. To fix the workflow, we need to include
that file in the list of files being extracted.

In addition, the cache action was upgraded from v2 to v4 because the old
one was broken with errors like the following:
C:/VulkanSDK/1.3.231.1/: Can't create '\\\\?\\C:\\VulkanSDK\\1.3.231.1'
@patowen
Copy link
Collaborator Author

patowen commented Jun 29, 2024

Since the Windows package workflow doesn't run by default on PRs, there's not a good way to test this fix here until it is merged. However, I have tested it myself, and the results will be temporarily available at https://github.com/patowen/hypermine/actions.

@patowen patowen requested a review from Ralith June 29, 2024 12:34
.github/workflows/package.yml Show resolved Hide resolved
@Ralith Ralith merged commit d49df99 into Ralith:master Jun 30, 2024
4 checks passed
@patowen patowen deleted the fix-package-windows-workflow branch June 30, 2024 02:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants