Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: gains nace_classification version 2.1 #348

Merged
merged 23 commits into from
Mar 12, 2024
Merged

Conversation

jdhoffa
Copy link
Member

@jdhoffa jdhoffa commented Mar 6, 2024

The NACE version 2.1 and ISIC revision 5 classification bridges are functionally identical for all PACTA-relevant sectors.
ISIC revision 5 was added in #347
This PR also now adds NACE version 2.1.

Relates to #344
Incidentally closes #234

Again @jacobvjk would appreciate a content review here to ensure that the sectoral mapping make sense

@jdhoffa jdhoffa requested a review from jacobvjk March 6, 2024 14:37
@jdhoffa
Copy link
Member Author

jdhoffa commented Mar 11, 2024

bump @jacobvjk

Copy link
Member

@jacobvjk jacobvjk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

there are a number of duplicate codes introduced by keeping the mapping columns
also some of the codes do not seems to align between isic and nace so they need updating

data-raw/classification_bridge.R Show resolved Hide resolved
data-raw/classification_bridge.R Show resolved Hide resolved
data-raw/classification_bridge.R Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
data-raw/classification_bridge.R Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
data-raw/classification_bridge.R Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
data-raw/classification_bridge.R Show resolved Hide resolved
data-raw/classification_bridge.R Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
data-raw/classification_bridge.R Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
data-raw/classification_bridge.R Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
data-raw/classification_bridge.R Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@jdhoffa jdhoffa requested a review from jacobvjk March 11, 2024 17:30
@jdhoffa
Copy link
Member Author

jdhoffa commented Mar 11, 2024

@jacobvjk I think this is ready for another review :-)

Copy link
Member

@jacobvjk jacobvjk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

minor change that I missed previously, then we are good to go

data-raw/classification_bridge.R Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@jdhoffa jdhoffa requested a review from jacobvjk March 12, 2024 07:28
jacobvjk
jacobvjk previously approved these changes Mar 12, 2024
Copy link
Member

@jacobvjk jacobvjk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

jacobvjk
jacobvjk previously approved these changes Mar 12, 2024
@jdhoffa jdhoffa merged commit 964b799 into main Mar 12, 2024
24 checks passed
@jdhoffa jdhoffa deleted the 234-nace_gains_description branch March 12, 2024 08:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

feat: individual sector_classification bridges gain title column describing what the code refers to
2 participants