-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add more checks on repo status #13
Conversation
Work to continue:
|
What would a |
The easiest way to get one is to misformat the CODEOWNERS file, but more generally laid out here: https://docs.github.com/en/rest/repos/repos?apiVersion=2022-11-28#list-codeowners-errors |
Hey @AlexAxthelm let me know if you want me to re-review? |
Yeah, still puttering on this for a little more. marking as draft. Added a check that the repo is using the standard TODO:
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #13 +/- ##
======================================
Coverage 0.00% 0.00%
======================================
Files 1 9 +8
Lines 87 338 +251
======================================
- Misses 87 338 +251 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
@jdhoffa Ready for review. There's a byunch of utilities here that you can feel free to integrate or not as you see fit. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Syntactically it looks good, but I got a weird error when trying to source the github-repos.Rmd
file, which I suppose is the main use-case of this repo?
Not sure if there's some weirdness when it tries to fetch info on it's own repo?
Big additions here: