use obvious fake path in example #324
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
- closes #322 (maybe) in particular, as suggested by #322 (comment) @jdhoffa should we leave #322 open as a suggestion to include a recommendation of setting up a new RStudio project?
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #324 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 51.82% 51.82%
=======================================
Files 29 29
Lines 3178 3178
=======================================
Hits 1647 1647
Misses 1531 1531 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
No, I think this supersedes/ addresses the intent of #322 |
jdhoffa
approved these changes
Dec 9, 2024
jacobvjk
approved these changes
Dec 10, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
in particular, as suggested by #322 (comment)
@jdhoffa should we leave #322 open as a suggestion to include a recommendation of setting up a new RStudio project?