You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Advantage would be to slightly improve matching performance and use one consistent ABCD data set throughout the analysis.
Drawback is that the removal of inactive companies is only needed for aggregate metrics, not standard PACTA and applying the prep/removal will add an unnecessary step for standard PACTA potentially reducing the match success rate.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
If we are potentially removing inactive companies anyway, it could lead to a slightly easier matching process.
Originally posted by @jdhoffa in #8 (comment)
AB#10475
Advantage would be to slightly improve matching performance and use one consistent ABCD data set throughout the analysis.
Drawback is that the removal of inactive companies is only needed for aggregate metrics, not standard PACTA and applying the prep/removal will add an unnecessary step for standard PACTA potentially reducing the match success rate.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: