Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

noncliff: Documentation for overview of Generalized Stabilizer Representation #409

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: nonclif
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Fe-r-oz
Copy link
Contributor

@Fe-r-oz Fe-r-oz commented Oct 30, 2024

Basic documentation for Genstab is added.

This is the Browser display of what the timeline will look like.
Screenshot_select-area_20241030212000

In markdown,

timeline
    title Related Work in Generalization of the Gottesman-Knill Theorem
    1997 : Gottesman [3] introduces stabilizer formalism and the Gottesman-Knill theorem.
    2002 : Bartlett et al. [4] expand to continuous variable quantum computation.
    2004 : Aaronson and Gottesman [5] improve measurement time complexity to 𝒪(n²).
    2006 : Anders and Briegel [6] achieve 𝒪(n log n) speedup in time complexity with graph states.
    2012 : Bermejo-Vega and Van den Nest [7] generalize to any finite Abelian group from n-qubits ℤ₂ⁿ.
    2012 : Yoder [2] presents the Generalized Stabilizer with a novel state representation.
Loading

@Fe-r-oz Fe-r-oz changed the title noncliff: Documentation for Generalized Stabilizer Representation noncliff: Documentation for overview of Generalized Stabilizer Representation Oct 30, 2024
@Fe-r-oz Fe-r-oz force-pushed the fa/noncliffdoc branch 6 times, most recently from 52706fb to cbd78ea Compare October 31, 2024 05:44
@Fe-r-oz
Copy link
Contributor Author

Fe-r-oz commented Oct 31, 2024

The second schematic detail:

Yoder investigated the classical simulation of quantum circuits in the context of strong simulation, which focuses on calculating exact probabilities for specific measurement outcomes.

mindmap
  root((Classical Simulation of Quantum Circuits))
    Strong Simulation
      Goal: Exact probability of specific outcome
      Example: Calculate probability of outcome 01
      Precision: High, requires precise probabilities
      Complexity:: Can be #P-complete
    Weak Simulation
      Goal: Sample outcome close to quantum distribution
      Example: Sample outcomes like 00, 01, 10, 11
      Precision: Lower, approximate sampling
      Complexity: Generally in BPP
Loading

@Fe-r-oz
Copy link
Contributor Author

Fe-r-oz commented Oct 31, 2024

The PR is ready for review, Thank you!

@Fe-r-oz
Copy link
Contributor Author

Fe-r-oz commented Dec 2, 2024

@Krastanov, please find the schematic that provides the summary of Ted's work. Thanks to your feedback, I have implemented Algorithm 2 in #427. I think we should have brief documentation about each of these algorithms along with their doctests in the documentation as well.

graph TD
    A[GeneralizedStabilizer <br> by Ted Yoder] --> B[Clifford Gates]
    B --> C1[Algorithm 𝟏]
    C1 --> D1[apply!❨sm, 𝐂❩]
    
    A --> E[Pauli Measurements]
    E --> C2[Algorithm 𝟐]
    C2 --> D2[projectrand!❨sm, 𝐏❩]
    
    A --> F[Pauli Channels]
    F --> C3[Algorithm 𝟑]
    C3 --> D3[apply!❨sm, 𝛏❩]
Loading

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants