Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Generate qiskit-ibm-transpiler 0.9.3 API docs #2503

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 18, 2024
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion docs/api/qiskit-ibm-transpiler/_package.json
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
{
"name": "qiskit-ibm-transpiler",
"version": "0.9.2"
"version": "0.9.3"
}
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ python_api_name: qiskit_ibm_transpiler.ai.AICliffordSynthesis

**Parameters**

**dag** ([*DAGCircuit*](/api/qiskit/qiskit.dagcircuit.DAGCircuit "(in Qiskit v1.3)")) – the dag on which the pass is run.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we know why these links disappeared?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

@arnaucasau arnaucasau Dec 18, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the review!!

I think it's because of a change in the requirements (this line), but I'm not completely sure.

As I understand, before, we were setting this dependency qiskit~=1.0, and that meant we wanted the latest version of qiskit greater or equal to 1.0, which is 1.3.

Now, by using qiskit>=1.0,<1.3, there's more than one version allowed, and I guess the link is not generated for a specific version as before.

Does that make sense @Eric-Arellano?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That makes sense, thanks.

Not related to this PR, but I'm slightly concerned about them pinning Qiskit < 1.3. We're currently using Qiskit 1.3 so this means we won't be able to upgrade to the latest version of the transpiler service

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agreed! I think they are already working on it -> Qiskit/qiskit-ibm-transpiler#144

**dag** (*DAGCircuit*) – the dag on which the pass is run.

**Raises**

Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ python_api_name: qiskit_ibm_transpiler.ai.AILinearFunctionSynthesis

**Parameters**

**dag** ([*DAGCircuit*](/api/qiskit/qiskit.dagcircuit.DAGCircuit "(in Qiskit v1.3)")) – the dag on which the pass is run.
**dag** (*DAGCircuit*) – the dag on which the pass is run.

**Raises**

Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ python_api_name: qiskit_ibm_transpiler.ai.AIPermutationSynthesis

**Parameters**

**dag** ([*DAGCircuit*](/api/qiskit/qiskit.dagcircuit.DAGCircuit "(in Qiskit v1.3)")) – the dag on which the pass is run.
**dag** (*DAGCircuit*) – the dag on which the pass is run.

**Raises**

Expand Down
Loading
Loading