docs: added difference between get_ commands and fetch_ commands in FAQ

[Blue-Robin-Taken]

Added the difference between get_ commands and fetch_ commands

Summary

Information

• This PR fixes an issue.
• This PR adds something new (e.g. new method or parameters).
• This PR is a breaking change (e.g. methods or parameters removed/renamed).
• This PR is not a code change (e.g. documentation, README, typehinting,
  examples, ...).

Checklist

• I have searched the open pull requests for duplicates.
• If code changes were made then they have been tested.
  • I have updated the documentation to reflect the changes.
• If type: ignore comments were used, a comment is also left explaining why.
• I have updated the changelog to include these changes.

[JustaSqu1d]

I think using a simpler example like bot.fetch_user vs bot.get_user would be easier to understand.

My previous review still applies.

[Lulalaby]

I think this change leads to nowhere.
I'm still having the opinion that it's obvious.
We shouldn't deal with user stupidness.

[JustaSqu1d]

I think this change leads to nowhere. I'm still having the opinion that it's obvious. We shouldn't deal with user stupidness.

Saying that you need members intent to do this in another method instead of the function itself, for example, is anything, but obvious.

[Lulalaby]

Then please create a solid pull request yourself with a correct faq about it or better document it in the docstring

[Blue-Robin-Taken]

@Lulalaby What exactly do you want?

We shouldn't deal with user stupidness.

What would be a "solid" PR, and can't I edit and fix the PR here?

[Lulalaby]

"user stupidness" wasn't meant as in your pr.
I meant it as in we shouldn't need to documents everything into FAQs.

[JustaSqu1d]

I think using a simpler example like bot.fetch_user vs bot.get_user would be easier to understand.

My previous review still applies.

You can't just re-request a review without acknowledging my previous one.

[plun1331]

my thoughts on this: i personally haven't seen this question frequently asked

[Lulalaby]

Yeah exactly that and that's why I've closed it in the first place. But squid reopened it

[Blue-Robin-Taken]

I think using a simpler example like bot.fetch_user vs bot.get_user would be easier to understand.

My previous review still applies.

You can't just re-request a review without acknowledging my previous one.

I thought I did but I don't have much github experience... Sorry about that. I'll try to fix it

[Blue-Robin-Taken]

my thoughts on this: i personally haven't seen this question frequently asked

Although it's not frequently asked, it's gotta be listed somewhere when it is asked.
Where else should it be listed then? @plun1331

[Lulalaby]

simple: no where

[plun1331]

my thoughts on this: i personally haven't seen this question frequently asked

Although it's not frequently asked, it's gotta be listed somewhere when it is asked.
Where else should it be listed then? @plun1331

In the entire time I've been with pycord I've only observed it asked 3-5 times, and the answer is fairly simple to explain each time: get_x gets from cache, fetch_x fetches from discord

If we had to make an entry for every question asked about the library, this FAQ page would be extremely long

[Lulalaby]

And so I'm closing it.