Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Set default_reaction_emoji in a ForumChannel #2174

Closed
tjhubz opened this issue Jul 21, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #2178
Closed

Set default_reaction_emoji in a ForumChannel #2174

tjhubz opened this issue Jul 21, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #2178
Labels
API Reflection Discords API wasn't correctly reflected in the lib feature request New feature request priority: medium Medium Priority
Milestone

Comments

@tjhubz
Copy link

tjhubz commented Jul 21, 2023

Summary

There is no way to set the default_reaction_emoji in a ForumChannel.

What is the feature request for?

The core library

The Problem

In the Discord API, it's possible to set the default_reaction_emoji of a forum channel (found here).

However, this is not currently supported in Pycord.

The Ideal Solution

Support should be added to set the default_reaction_emoji for forum channels.

The Current Solution

No response

Additional Context

No response

@tjhubz tjhubz added the feature request New feature request label Jul 21, 2023
@JustaSqu1d JustaSqu1d added this to the v2.5 milestone Jul 21, 2023
@JustaSqu1d JustaSqu1d added priority: medium Medium Priority API Reflection Discords API wasn't correctly reflected in the lib labels Jul 21, 2023
@plun1331 plun1331 linked a pull request Jul 23, 2023 that will close this issue
9 tasks
@Dorukyum Dorukyum removed the on hold label Dec 2, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
API Reflection Discords API wasn't correctly reflected in the lib feature request New feature request priority: medium Medium Priority
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants