Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixed code factor quality issues #558

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Dec 11, 2024
Merged

Fixed code factor quality issues #558

merged 4 commits into from
Dec 11, 2024

Conversation

pingu2k4
Copy link
Contributor

@pingu2k4 pingu2k4 commented Dec 11, 2024

Changes

  • Fixed code factor quality issues

Issue

Categorise the PR

  • feature
  • bug
  • docs
  • security
  • meta
  • patch
  • minor
  • major

Description by Korbit AI

What change is being made?

Refactor JSON converters to improve code clarity, encapsulation, and quality, and update corresponding tests.

Why are these changes being made?

The changes are made to resolve code quality issues identified by CodeFactor, focusing on enhancing readability and maintainability by introducing helper methods to break down complex logic into smaller, easier-to-understand components. This refactor also aims to encapsulate related functionalities and ensure concise error handling. Tests have been updated to reflect these changes to maintain integrity and verification of behaviors.

Is this description stale? Ask me to generate a new description by commenting /korbit-generate-pr-description

@pingu2k4 pingu2k4 self-assigned this Dec 11, 2024
@pingu2k4 pingu2k4 linked an issue Dec 11, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
@github-actions github-actions bot added the meta label Dec 11, 2024
Copy link

Code Coverage

Package Line Rate Branch Rate Complexity Health
PinguApps.Appwrite.Client 100% 100% 136
PinguApps.Appwrite.Server 100% 100% 150
PinguApps.Appwrite.Shared 100% 100% 1328
Summary 100% (3652 / 3653) 100% (647 / 649) 1614

Copy link

Test Results

3 650 tests   - 2   3 650 ✅  - 2   26s ⏱️ -1s
    3 suites ±0       0 💤 ±0 
    3 files   ±0       0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 5c5a167. ± Comparison against base commit 9301dbe.

This pull request removes 342 and adds 340 tests. Note that renamed tests count towards both.
PinguApps.Appwrite.Server.Tests.Clients.Users.UsersClientTests ‑ CreateUserJwt_ShouldReturnSuccess_WhenApiCallSucceeds(request: CreateUserJwtRequest { Duration = 1800, SessionId = "6758be8e0023e3172d4a", UserId = "6758be8e0023e58fb1bf", ValidationContext = None })
PinguApps.Appwrite.Server.Tests.Clients.Users.UsersClientTests ‑ CreateUserJwt_ShouldReturnSuccess_WhenApiCallSucceeds(request: CreateUserJwtRequest { Duration = null, SessionId = null, UserId = "6758be8e0023d3662ff7", ValidationContext = None })
PinguApps.Appwrite.Server.Tests.Clients.Users.UsersClientTests ‑ ListUserLogs_ShouldReturnSuccess_WhenApiCallSucceeds(request: ListUserLogsRequest { Queries = null, UserId = "6758be8e0023f3f18b28", ValidationContext = None })
PinguApps.Appwrite.Server.Tests.Clients.Users.UsersClientTests ‑ ListUserLogs_ShouldReturnSuccess_WhenApiCallSucceeds(request: ListUserLogsRequest { Queries = null, UserId = "6758be8e0023f9e66898", ValidationContext = None })
PinguApps.Appwrite.Server.Tests.Clients.Users.UsersClientTests ‑ ListUserTargets_ShouldReturnSuccess_WhenApiCallSucceeds(request: ListUserTargetsRequest { Queries = null, UserId = "6758be8e0023f17f87dc", ValidationContext = None })
PinguApps.Appwrite.Server.Tests.Clients.Users.UsersClientTests ‑ ListUserTargets_ShouldReturnSuccess_WhenApiCallSucceeds(request: ListUserTargetsRequest { Queries = null, UserId = "6758be8e0023f698443d", ValidationContext = None })
PinguApps.Appwrite.Server.Tests.Clients.Users.UsersClientTests ‑ UpdateUserLabels_ShouldReturnSuccess_WhenApiCallSucceeds(request: UpdateUserLabelsRequest { Labels = ["label1", "label2"], UserId = "6758be8e0023fa6ebd41", ValidationContext = None })
PinguApps.Appwrite.Server.Tests.Clients.Users.UsersClientTests ‑ UpdateUserLabels_ShouldReturnSuccess_WhenApiCallSucceeds(request: UpdateUserLabelsRequest { Labels = ["label3", "label4"], UserId = "6758be8e0023f9052e00", ValidationContext = None })
PinguApps.Appwrite.Shared.Tests.Converters.DocumentGenericConverterTests ‑ Read_MissingCreatedAt_ThrowsJsonException
PinguApps.Appwrite.Shared.Tests.Converters.DocumentGenericConverterTests ‑ Read_MissingUpdatedAt_ThrowsJsonException
…
PinguApps.Appwrite.Server.Tests.Clients.Users.UsersClientTests ‑ CreateUserJwt_ShouldReturnSuccess_WhenApiCallSucceeds(request: CreateUserJwtRequest { Duration = 1800, SessionId = "6758e31d00312117dd5f", UserId = "6758e31d00312ac1322b", ValidationContext = None })
PinguApps.Appwrite.Server.Tests.Clients.Users.UsersClientTests ‑ CreateUserJwt_ShouldReturnSuccess_WhenApiCallSucceeds(request: CreateUserJwtRequest { Duration = null, SessionId = null, UserId = "6758e31d0031177457d7", ValidationContext = None })
PinguApps.Appwrite.Server.Tests.Clients.Users.UsersClientTests ‑ ListUserLogs_ShouldReturnSuccess_WhenApiCallSucceeds(request: ListUserLogsRequest { Queries = null, UserId = "6758e31d0031213a5380", ValidationContext = None })
PinguApps.Appwrite.Server.Tests.Clients.Users.UsersClientTests ‑ ListUserLogs_ShouldReturnSuccess_WhenApiCallSucceeds(request: ListUserLogsRequest { Queries = null, UserId = "6758e31d00312aba99a0", ValidationContext = None })
PinguApps.Appwrite.Server.Tests.Clients.Users.UsersClientTests ‑ ListUserTargets_ShouldReturnSuccess_WhenApiCallSucceeds(request: ListUserTargetsRequest { Queries = null, UserId = "6758e31d00312005dc79", ValidationContext = None })
PinguApps.Appwrite.Server.Tests.Clients.Users.UsersClientTests ‑ ListUserTargets_ShouldReturnSuccess_WhenApiCallSucceeds(request: ListUserTargetsRequest { Queries = null, UserId = "6758e31d003127946663", ValidationContext = None })
PinguApps.Appwrite.Server.Tests.Clients.Users.UsersClientTests ‑ UpdateUserLabels_ShouldReturnSuccess_WhenApiCallSucceeds(request: UpdateUserLabelsRequest { Labels = ["label1", "label2"], UserId = "6758e31d003139395890", ValidationContext = None })
PinguApps.Appwrite.Server.Tests.Clients.Users.UsersClientTests ‑ UpdateUserLabels_ShouldReturnSuccess_WhenApiCallSucceeds(request: UpdateUserLabelsRequest { Labels = ["label3", "label4"], UserId = "6758e31d00313e78cb7c", ValidationContext = None })
PinguApps.Appwrite.Shared.Tests.Requests.Account.CreatePushTargetRequestTests ‑ IsValid_WithInvalidData_ReturnsFalse(request: CreatePushTargetRequest { Identifier = "", ProviderId = "provider123", TargetId = "6758e316000966fa8844", ValidationContext = None })
PinguApps.Appwrite.Shared.Tests.Requests.Account.CreatePushTargetRequestTests ‑ IsValid_WithInvalidData_ReturnsFalse(request: CreatePushTargetRequest { Identifier = null, ProviderId = "provider123", TargetId = "6758e316000964fa08e0", ValidationContext = None })
…

Copy link

@korbit-ai korbit-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Summary by Korbit AI

Code Health Comments

  • Enhance ValidateRequiredFields to log missing fields before exceptions for improved debugging clarity.
Suppressed issues based on your team's Korbit activity
This issue Is similar to Because
lines 40:43:

Consider logging the error before throwing the JsonException.

This will help in troubleshooting and provide more context about where the error occurred. You could use a logging framework or a simple Console.WriteLine() for this purpose.

Log exceptions before returning an exception response.

Similar issues were not addressed in the past
line 93:

It would be beneficial to log the unknown role format before throwing the exception.

This can provide valuable information for troubleshooting and improving the system's robustness.

Log exceptions before returning an exception response.

Similar issues were not addressed in the past
line 38:

It's a good practice to log the exception before throwing it.

This can provide valuable context for debugging. Consider adding a log statement to capture the invalid input value along with the exception message.

Log exceptions before returning an exception response.

Similar issues were not addressed in the past

When you react to issues (for example, an upvote or downvote) or you fix them, Korbit will tune future reviews based on these signals.

Files scanned
File Path Reviewed
src/PinguApps.Appwrite.Shared/Converters/AttributeJsonConverter.cs
src/PinguApps.Appwrite.Shared/Converters/PermissionJsonConverter.cs
src/PinguApps.Appwrite.Shared/Converters/DocumentGenericConverter.cs

Explore our documentation to understand the languages and file types we support and the files we ignore.

Need a new review? Comment /korbit-review on this PR and I'll review your latest changes.

Korbit Guide: Usage and Customization

Interacting with Korbit

  • You can manually ask Korbit to review your PR using the /korbit-review command in a comment at the root of your PR.
  • You can ask Korbit to generate a new PR description using the /korbit-generate-pr-description command in any comment on your PR.
  • Too many Korbit comments? I can resolve all my comment threads if you use the /korbit-resolve command in any comment on your PR.
  • Chat with Korbit on issues we post by tagging @korbit-ai in your reply.
  • Help train Korbit to improve your reviews by giving a 👍 or 👎 on the comments Korbit posts.

Customizing Korbit

  • Check out our docs on how you can make Korbit work best for you and your team.
  • Customize Korbit for your organization through the Korbit Console.

Current Korbit Configuration

General Settings
Setting Value
Review Schedule Automatic excluding drafts
Max Issue Count 10
Automatic PR Descriptions
Issue Categories
Category Enabled
Naming
Database Operations
Documentation
Logging
Error Handling
Systems and Environment
Objects and Data Structures
Readability and Maintainability
Asynchronous Processing
Design Patterns
Third-Party Libraries
Performance
Security
Functionality

Feedback and Support

@pingu2k4 pingu2k4 merged commit e3ec4b6 into dev Dec 11, 2024
6 checks passed
@pingu2k4 pingu2k4 deleted the 546-code-factor-quality branch December 11, 2024 01:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Task] Fix code quality issues from code factor
1 participant