Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WIP [ENH] Add singleshell benchmarking recon workflow #780

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

mattcieslak
Copy link
Collaborator

@mattcieslak mattcieslak commented Jul 11, 2024

cc @ameliecr

We're working on a project to compare tractometry methods using different reconstruction methods on single-shell acquisitions. There are too many initial steps that need to be shared for autotrack to use the simple recon spec json format. So this workflow would break up the initial calculation of qa and iso, and registration into separate steps.

Relevant thread: https://groups.google.com/g/dsi-studio/c/emMz-K8ewlo

@mattcieslak mattcieslak self-assigned this Jul 11, 2024
@mattcieslak mattcieslak changed the title [ENH] Add singleshell benchmarking recon workflow WIP [ENH] Add singleshell benchmarking recon workflow Jul 12, 2024
@tsalo
Copy link
Member

tsalo commented Nov 19, 2024

@mattcieslak do you want to reproduce this on QSIRecon?

@mattcieslak
Copy link
Collaborator Author

yes, this will be important for the clinical data processing. @smeisler this may be a better PR to get started on than synb0 for now since we'll need it for the clinical dmri. It is supposed to add @ameliecr's work on ss3t-autotrack into qsirecon

@tsalo
Copy link
Member

tsalo commented Nov 19, 2024

I've opened PennLINC/qsirecon#171 for this and linked to this PR.

@tsalo tsalo closed this Nov 19, 2024
@mattcieslak mattcieslak deleted the enh/singleshell-benchmark branch December 3, 2024 19:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants