Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Seperate out checkpoint tests for audit tests #30556

Merged

Conversation

tjwatson
Copy link
Member

@tjwatson
Copy link
Member Author

tjwatson commented Jan 14, 2025

#build (view Open Liberty Personal Build - ❌ completed with errors/failures.)

Note: Target locations of links might be accessible only to IBM employees.

@LibbyBot
Copy link

Code analysis and actions

DO NOT DELETE THIS COMMENT.
  • 7 FAT files were changed, added, or removed.

  • Check that the build did not break the affected FAT suite(s).

  • 1 test infrastructure code files were changed.

  • Test failures/errors in the build could be due to these changes.

  • Please describe in a separate comment how you tested your changes.

@tjwatson
Copy link
Member Author

tjwatson commented Jan 15, 2025

#build (view Open Liberty Personal Build - ❌ completed with errors/failures.)

Note: Target locations of links might be accessible only to IBM employees.

@LibbyBot
Copy link

Code analysis and actions

DO NOT DELETE THIS COMMENT.
  • 7 FAT files were changed, added, or removed.

  • Check that the build did not break the affected FAT suite(s).

  • 1 test infrastructure code files were changed.

  • Test failures/errors in the build could be due to these changes.

  • Please describe in a separate comment how you tested your changes.

@tjwatson tjwatson force-pushed the telemetryLogsCheckpointTest branch from 2f900db to 8d834a5 Compare January 21, 2025 21:18
@tjwatson
Copy link
Member Author

tjwatson commented Jan 21, 2025

#build (view Open Liberty Personal Build - ❌ completed with errors/failures.)

Note: Target locations of links might be accessible only to IBM employees.

@tjwatson tjwatson requested a review from pgunapal January 21, 2025 21:20
@LibbyBot
Copy link

Code analysis and actions

DO NOT DELETE THIS COMMENT.
  • 7 FAT files were changed, added, or removed.

  • Check that the build did not break the affected FAT suite(s).

  • 1 test infrastructure code files were changed.

  • Test failures/errors in the build could be due to these changes.

  • Please describe in a separate comment how you tested your changes.

@LibbyBot
Copy link

Your personal build request is at https://wasrtc.hursley.ibm.com:9443/jazz/resource/itemOid/com.ibm.team.build.BuildResult/_xHp-MNh1Ee-0yqtOHBleJw

Target locations of links might be accessible only to IBM employees.

Copy link
Member

@pgunapal pgunapal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@tjwatson tjwatson merged commit 827cd61 into OpenLiberty:integration Jan 22, 2025
2 of 3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants