-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 452
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Delete messages from coordinator after they become final #2471
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
17 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
9745003
Delete messages from coordinator after they become final
ganeshvanahalli 3dd19d9
Merge branch 'master' into seqcoordinator-delete-finalizedmsgs
joshuacolvin0 ab8e6a8
address PR comments
ganeshvanahalli 4cff8b3
add test for deleteFinalizedMsgsFromRedis
ganeshvanahalli 2bea7be
Merge branch 'master' into seqcoordinator-delete-finalizedmsgs
ganeshvanahalli e6cd9a4
minor bug fix- finalizedMsgCount should be non-inclusive
ganeshvanahalli 08c7e9e
code refactor
ganeshvanahalli 99e6032
Merge branch 'master' into seqcoordinator-delete-finalizedmsgs
ganeshvanahalli 379bf7e
minor fix
ganeshvanahalli ae1dbec
Merge branch 'master' into seqcoordinator-delete-finalizedmsgs
ganeshvanahalli 52bba36
Merge branch 'master' into seqcoordinator-delete-finalizedmsgs
ganeshvanahalli 4848a05
address PR comments
ganeshvanahalli d8b056c
Merge branch 'master' into seqcoordinator-delete-finalizedmsgs
ganeshvanahalli 45eaee9
fix lint
ganeshvanahalli 71c7324
Merge branch 'master' into seqcoordinator-delete-finalizedmsgs
ganeshvanahalli ae4cc86
Merge branch 'master' into seqcoordinator-delete-finalizedmsgs
ganeshvanahalli bccdbe9
Merge branch 'master' into seqcoordinator-delete-finalizedmsgs
tsahee File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
do you gain something by having this function defined that way and not as a normal functin?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
like we use a bunch of SeqCoordinator methods such as
msgCountToSignedBytes
,getRemoteMsgCountImpl
,c.Client
etc.. so thought having a method on SeqCoordinator is a better option over a standalone function