Update flyway

[twerthi]

---

Background

Redgate has changed their method for their licensing from a license key to a personal access token. This PR adds the new PAT method and provides a warning that the license key method has been deprecated and will be removed in future versions.

Results

Enterprise features successfully work using the PAT method.

Before

The only way to use Enterprise features was to use the license key, which has been deprecated by Redgate.

After

Enterprise features will now work using either the PAT or license key methods, a warning is displayed if the license key is used letting the user know that it will be removed in future versions.

Pre-requisites

• Id should be a GUID that is not 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
  • NOTE If you are modifying an existing step template, please make sure that you do not modify the Id property (updating the Id will break the Library sync functionality in Octopus).
• Version should be incremented, otherwise the integration with Octopus won't update the step template correctly
• Parameter names should not start with $
• Step template parameter names (the ones declared in the JSON, not the script body) should be prefixed with a namespace so that they are less likely to clash with other user-defined variables in Octopus (see this issue). For example, use an abbreviated name of the step template or the category of the step template).
• LastModifiedBy field must be present, and (optionally) updated with the correct author
• The best practices documented here have been applied
• If a new Category has been created:
  • An image with the name {categoryname}.png must be present under the step-templates/logos folder
  • The switch in the humanize function in gulpfile.babel.js must have a case statement corresponding to it

Fixes # . If there is an open issue that this PR fixes add it here, otherwise just remove this line

[github-actions]

Start Hyponome locally

docker pull ghcr.io/hnrkndrssn/hyponome:main
docker run --rm -p 8000:8080 -it ghcr.io/hnrkndrssn/hyponome:main

Review in Hyponome

[harrisonmeister]

@twerthi - is this expected?

[twerthi]

That's a good question, I'm not sure. I hadn't noticed it was included, I didn't run anything that would have produced it, just updated the JSON file.

[harrisonmeister]

I'm mindful of changes to the package-lock file generally. If you arent expecting it to change, I'd probably say revert it?

[twerthi]

Pulled file from main branch and overwrote PR branch.

[harrisonmeister]

Change itself looks good. Just the query over the package-lock.json file

[harrisonmeister]

LGTM