Fix URL redirect #2030
Merged
Fix URL redirect #2030
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Related to #1990
It seems the link checker is not temperamental but is just doing its work. The problematic link doesn't return expected
200but instead is a redirect. I tested it in my fork and it worked.As for the rest of the issue -- I think it's worth researching available markdown link check solutions as the current one is deprecated. My understanding it's just a wrapper around markdown-link-check package.
It'd be a good staring point to decide whether redirects should be treated as accepted status codes.
I can look into addressing the rest of the #1990 if you'd like.