kde/frameworks: 5.93 -> 5.94

[andrevmatos]

Description of changes

Bump KDE Frameworks to 5.94, released in 13 May 2022

• Calligra build failure fixed by kde/gear: 22.04.0 -> 22.04.1 #172733
• KDE Plasma Mobile Gear failures fixed by #173264 libsForQt5.plasmaMobileGear: 21.08 -> 22.04 #153329

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandbox = true set in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 22.05 Release Notes (or backporting 21.11 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • (Release notes changes) Ran nixos/doc/manual/md-to-db.sh to update generated release notes
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

cc @NixOS/qt-kde

[drupol]

LGTM

[SuperSandro2000]

I would be happier if we used buildPythonApplication.

[andrevmatos]

Me too, but not sure how that'd pan out with kde's custom mkDerivation (which merges these attributes with srcs.nix and versions). Would you have a suggestion on how to integrate buildPythonApplication with that?

[SuperSandro2000]

Add it next to https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/pkgs/development/libraries/kde-frameworks/default.nix#L92-L94 ?

[andrevmatos]

Is the trouble worth it? Not like we build several python libraries/applications for all supported python environments/versions, the build is just a couple of setup.py commands, only enough to satisfy this marginally required dependency. Also, I tried it a little, and my Nix knowledge may not be enough, as it may involve passing the whole attrset of pythonPackages as parameters of the derivation, as is done with the libsForQt5 set, but I'm not sure about the safe way to do this with both in the same call.

[ttuegel]

Alternately, we could just drop this package. It's never been used in Nixpkgs. I'm not even sure it has ever been buildable before.