Update.readme #6
Conversation
move current README to be a fre-cli-flavored README
add old instructions with rose and stuff... etc.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks Ian for starting this needed documentation. It's tough as we haven't done it so far in part because this "workflow definition" repository is not usable without fre-cli. Should "how to postprocess fms history files" be in this repository or in fre-cli?
this is in the right direction, thanks!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I like where this is going but it needs some work.
We're not using the Rose optional configurations any longer so some of the steps can be simplified.
Should we document how to create the rose-suite.conf and rose-app.conf's manually, or only document how to use fre pp configure-yaml?
|
> We're not using the Rose optional configurations any longer so some of the steps can be simplified. > Should we document how to create the rose-suite.conf and rose-app.conf's manually, or only document how to use |
no longer using a submodule approach
formatting and edits, clean up.
another pass- more formatting, backticks for code objects or variables or field values etc. break up some long lines.
intermediate commit
another intermediate commit for sanity
getting there... should be good for trying to use this tomorrow and conduct tweaks/fix issues with my wording/descriptions etc.
fix subsection
another pass
another iteration. adding in a few settings... static component maybe should be taken out, the logic seems wrong for the task dependence and i dont want to show that here.
one more tweak, up next, one more test start-to-end
|
Good enough for now. Illustrates what the user needs to pay attention to, and the instructions are copy/paste oriented enough. A problem for an issue+PR: statics processing task-dependence is not right |
No description provided.