Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ERA5 catalogs -- filename accommodation #80

Draft
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

meteorologist15
Copy link

Adjusts crawler script to scan for files not containing a "." character within the name if the file comes from the UDA.

@aradhakrishnanGFDL
Copy link
Collaborator

@meteorologist15 recap of what we discussed: We can use activity_id = "UDA" here and the csv will have this info then. For future, we can also consider using this project being passed around in the code for handling certain paths differently:

@aradhakrishnanGFDL
Copy link
Collaborator

@meteorologist15 recap of what we discussed: We can use activity_id = "UDA" here and the csv will have this info then. For future, we can also consider using this project being passed around in the code for handling certain paths differently:

uda string could be grabbed from the input_path

@aradhakrishnanGFDL
Copy link
Collaborator

@meteorologist15 documenting minutes for reference

using project as uda for the special case maneuvering in the code sounds great.
For the sprint, focus on cloud variables for Ray's analysis. Ensure frequency and time is captured from the DRS or filename. You may have to tweak your existing configuration. See examples in configs or tests in the repository.

variable_id: lets revisit this after tomorrow. It's possible that you want to capture the descriptive names in the filename as standard_name in the catalog. And, then come back to the mapping route or the netcdf look up route.

If it's the descriptive names that's captured, we have to tweak Ray's analysis a bit, but should be do-able. Keeping all options open!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants