Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor GFDLMP v1. Introduce GFDLMP v3. Fix initialization bug. #823

Open
wants to merge 46 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

dustinswales
Copy link
Contributor

@dustinswales dustinswales commented Apr 22, 2024

Description (*updated on 11/18/2024)

This PR contains host side changes to accommodate a new cloud microphysics parameterization in the physics.

For the refactoring, all of the configuration/namelist info is moved into a common module that is referenced by both MP versions and a shared fv_sat_adj.F90. There are default values for the scheme configurations defined within this module, and overwritten by the namelist, if provided. Both the v1 and v3 rely on some of the same parameters, but with different default values. This is handled by introducing a pre-processor directive into the new configuration module.

Note. The "initialization bug" results in itsy-bitsy changes to the results, and is not addressed in these changes. A complete solution would require the GFDL MP scheme namelist to be read in during the dycore initialization.

Testing

Tested on Hera using Intel
No changes to GFDL MP v1 enabled baselines (control_iovr4 and hafs_regional_atm)

@RuiyuSun
Copy link
Contributor

@dustinswales I'd like to test this version. How do I check this code? Thanks!

@dustinswales
Copy link
Contributor Author

git clone --recursive --branch feature/gfdlmpv3 https://github.com/dustinswales/ufs-weather-model.git

@grantfirl
Copy link
Collaborator

Dependency: ufs-community/ccpp-physics#195

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants