Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[sui-edge-proxy] add filters for certain reqs we aren't interested in #20908

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 17, 2025

Conversation

johnjmartin
Copy link
Contributor

Description

the new logging feature was including a lot of requests we're not interested in


Release notes

Check each box that your changes affect. If none of the boxes relate to your changes, release notes aren't required.

For each box you select, include information after the relevant heading that describes the impact of your changes that a user might notice and any actions they must take to implement updates.

  • Protocol:
  • Nodes (Validators and Full nodes):
  • gRPC:
  • JSON-RPC:
  • GraphQL:
  • CLI:
  • Rust SDK:

@johnjmartin johnjmartin requested a review from gegaowp January 16, 2025 22:43
Copy link

vercel bot commented Jan 16, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

2 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
multisig-toolkit ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Jan 16, 2025 10:44pm
sui-kiosk ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Jan 16, 2025 10:44pm

@johnjmartin johnjmartin changed the title add filters for certain reqs we aren't interested in [sui-edge-proxy] add filters for certain reqs we aren't interested in Jan 16, 2025
@johnjmartin johnjmartin temporarily deployed to sui-typescript-aws-kms-test-env January 16, 2025 22:43 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
Copy link
Contributor

@gegaowp gegaowp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LG, thanks for the patch!

@gegaowp gegaowp merged commit a16c942 into MystenLabs:main Jan 17, 2025
46 of 48 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants