-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 81
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
efp: start pylibefp interface #144
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
loriab
commented
Aug 28, 2019
- this one test passes but not ready for merging
|
||
_defaults = { | ||
"name": "PylibEFP", | ||
"scratch": False, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is probably thread safe?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
all in memory and all functions acting on same struct instance, so yes.
import qcengine as qcng | ||
from qcengine.testing import using_pylibefp | ||
|
||
b2a = 0.529177 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I assume efp uses its own conversion? Can we add a comment here about that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'll look it up, but this particular one is just to get the geometry in with both round numbers and to match the answers taken from libefp test suite. outputs are all in Eh, a0. So this conversion isn't a broad concern.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Makes sense. Should be fine as long as we note it.