Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adds spatial perturbation operator #979

Open
wants to merge 8 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

daflack
Copy link
Contributor

@daflack daflack commented Dec 10, 2024

Adds an operator to generate mesoscale spatial perturbations using either a Gaussian filter or a Uniform filter.

Fixes #950

Contribution checklist

Aim to have all relevant checks ticked off before merging. See the developer's guide for more detail.

  • Documentation has been updated to reflect change.
  • New code has tests, and affected old tests have been updated.
  • All tests and CI checks pass.
  • Ensured the pull request title is descriptive.
  • Conda lock files have been updated if dependencies have changed.
  • Attributed any Generative AI, such as GitHub Copilot, used in this PR.
  • Marked the PR as ready to review.

@daflack daflack added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 10, 2024
@daflack daflack self-assigned this Dec 10, 2024
@daflack daflack marked this pull request as draft December 10, 2024 10:53
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 10, 2024

Coverage

@daflack daflack force-pushed the 950_spatial_perturbation_fields branch from cacaa1a to d465809 Compare December 10, 2024 15:39
@daflack daflack marked this pull request as ready for review December 10, 2024 15:42
@daflack daflack marked this pull request as draft December 12, 2024 12:53
@daflack
Copy link
Contributor Author

daflack commented Dec 12, 2024

Converting back to draft to remove CubeList functionality due to operator purpose creep.

@daflack daflack force-pushed the 950_spatial_perturbation_fields branch from d465809 to aecc8fa Compare December 12, 2024 14:41
@daflack daflack marked this pull request as ready for review December 12, 2024 14:51
@daflack
Copy link
Contributor Author

daflack commented Dec 12, 2024

Now ready for review @jfrost-mo and @jwarner8.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Spatial perturbation fields
1 participant