Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Upgrade intuit-oauth from 1.2.0 to 1.5.0 #2

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

snyk-bot
Copy link

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade intuit-oauth from 1.2.0 to 1.5.0.

  • The recommended version is 3 versions ahead of your current version.
  • The recommended version was released a month ago, on 2019-08-23.
Release notes
  • 1.5.0 - 2019-08-23

    New Release Candidate: 1.5.0 🎉

    Problem :

    • The csrf tokens created did not follow the singleton pattern.
    • Occasional use of strict mode keywords made the package usage difficult in ES6 compliant environments

    Solution :

    • csrf token instance created at the time of instantiating OAuthClient. Singleton JS design pattern adopted.
    • Adopted ES6 standardization
    • ESLint enabled

    Issues Fixed :

    #4
    #30

  • 1.4.0 - 2019-07-19

    New Release Candidate: 1.4.0 🎉

    Problem:
    The access-tokens are valid post the revoke() functionality.

    Solution:
    Clearing the token object is essential once the revoke() is invoked. A helper method to handle this feature is created : clearToken

    Issues:
    #28 : Fixed

  • 1.3.0 - 2019-07-09

    Issue Fixed - #24

    Release Updates :
    Revoke token README.md updated

  • 1.2.0 - 2019-04-25

    1.) the setToken() and the constructor for passing the tokens are handled efficiently now.
    2.) #20 and #7 - Fixed
    3.) #19 - HTTP 4XX Errors handled with more information.

    cc: Shout out to @ryan-sandy

from intuit-oauth GitHub Release Notes


🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust upgrade PR settings

🔕 Ignore this dependency or unsubscribe from future upgrade PRs

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant