Lots of FAQ, one typo fix, and Spreading the Faith errata

content/card-data/arcs/en-US/blightedreach.yml

@@ -2443,7 +2443,7 @@
      
     *This is not stealing, so cards like Sworn Guardians don't prevent it. The Advocate can even demand protected Guild cards!*
   image: F413
-  name: Advocate's Deman
+  name: Advocate's Demand
   tags:
     - Blighted Reach
     - Edict

content/errata/arcs/en-US.yml

@@ -37,3 +37,6 @@
 - errata:
     - text: "The card reference for 'Founder's next Resolution card' should be '23.'"
   card: Founder Act I Resolution
+- errata:
+    - text: "The Teach action should have the attach and scrap sentences swapped. You cannot scrap unless you attach."
+  card: Spreading the Faith

content/faq/arcs/en-US.yml

@@ -263,6 +263,14 @@
         If I have no Material or Fuel, can I use Tycoon's Ambition?
       a: >-
         You can use its ability even if you have zero Material and Fuel.
+    - q: >-
+        How does this interact with $link:Material Cartel$ or $link:Fuel Cartel$?
+      a: >-
+        Nothing happens to the Material and Fuel on those cards. You can still use Tycoon's Ambition.
+    - q: >-
+        In the campaign, how does this interact with frozen resources?
+      a: >-
+        They are not discarded. You can still use Tycoon's Ambition.
   card: Tycoon's Ambition
 - faq:
     - q: >-
@@ -333,6 +341,14 @@
         Can I trade Golems in the Summit?
       a: >-
         Not in Act I. If the Caretaker continues to Act II, $link:Knowledge Set Free$ allows for Golem trading.
+    - q: >-
+        When exactly does someone keep a Golem after using it?
+      a: >-
+        If the player with the $link:Golem Hearth$ uses a Golem and nobody else has slots. As long as the Golem Hearth is in the game, its holder will always have slots for Golems.
+    - q: >-
+        Can I override the Imperial Truce Law with the Warrior Golem?
+      a: >-
+        Nope!
   card: Golems
 - faq:
     - q: >-
@@ -345,6 +361,10 @@
         Does this ever override the power of $link:Imperial Authority$?
       a: >-
         No.
+    - q: >-
+        Does this mean that Regents can battle each other in Imperial systems now?
+      a: >-
+        No. Even though it prevents some Regents from Commanding the Imperial Fleet, you still have to follow the Truce Law.
   card: Martial Law
 - faq:
     - q: >-
@@ -358,3 +378,141 @@
       a: >-
         No. They have a Loyal piece in the Pirate Haven's system.
   card: Pirate Act III Objective
+- faq:
+    - q: >-
+        Does the Sponsored token return somewhere when the Sponsored ambition is declared?
+      a: >-
+        No. It remains on its current ambition.
+    - q: >-
+        Can I still place a resource on the Imperial Trust if the Sponsored token did not move?
+      a: >-
+        Yes!
+  card: Imperial Sponsor
+- faq:
+    - q: >-
+        Does this card ability trigger when I secure it from the Court?
+      a: >-
+        No. Securing Council Insiders does not trigger its own Secure modifier.
+  card: Council Insiders
+- faq:
+    - q: >-
+        Can I advance my Close Deals with Rivals objectives by returning Favors in the Call to Order?
+      a: >-
+        No. You can only advance in Summit Negotiations.
+  card: Magnate Act I Objective
+- faq:
+    - q: >-
+        Do I advance with Corner the Market if I take a Monopoly from another player?
+      a: >-
+        No. You have to take it from the supply.
+  card: Magnate Act II Objective
+- faq:
+    - q: >-
+        In the campaign, do I have to control a Loyal city in order to free it?
+      a: >-
+        Yes!
+    - q: >-
+        In the campaign, can I free cities on Flagships?
+      a: >-
+        No.
+    - q: >-
+        In the campaign Crisis, what happens if players are tied for most Power?
+      a: >-
+        The player closest in turn order to the player with initiative is affected.
+  card: Song of Freedom
+- faq:
+    - q: >-
+        Can I flip the Council while it is not in the Court?
+      a: >-
+        No.
+  card: Council Intrigue
+- faq:
+    - q: >-
+        Does this limit how I can declare ambitions in nonstandard ways, like with $link:Galactic Bards$?
+      a: >-
+        Yes.
+  card: Dominant Faith
+- faq:
+    - q: >-
+        Can someone force me to give them a resource off this card by returning my Favor during the Summit's Call to Order?
+      a: >-
+        Yes.
+  card: Merchant League
+- faq:
+    - q: >-
+        Do I fulfill the requirement if I am in second place for the lowest ambition, which gives 0 Power?
+      a: >-
+        Yes. The clarification text in italics is generally true but misleading in this specific case.
+    - q: >-
+        Does this block card abilities like $link:Galactic Bards$?
+      a: >-
+        No, just Prelude actions and New actions.
+  card: Guild Overseers
+- faq:
+    - q: >-
+        Do I advance for Sow Division in the Reach if I already have the initiative and hold it at the end of the round?
+      a: >-
+        No. You need to get it from somewhere else.
+  card: Partisan Act I Objective
+- faq:
+    - q: >-
+        If I pivot to a new Fate in Act III, do I clear my Outrage?
+      a: >-
+        No. At this point, the relevant card is tucked outside your play area, and this part of the ability is no longer relevant.
+  card: Partisan Seizing
+- faq:
+    - q: >-
+        What happens if I demand a protected Guild card?
+      a: >-
+        The holder simply gives you a Favor, since they cannot actually give you the card. Sucks for them.
+  card: Advocate's Demand
+- faq:
+    - q: >-
+        Does this trigger Ransack the Court?
+      a: >-
+        No. There is nothing left to Ransack. The world is pretty blown up.
+    - q: >-
+        How does this interact with $link:Bunkers$ and $link:Banners of Hegemony$?
+      a: >-
+        They are removed and added to this card.
+    - q: >-
+        Can I rebuild $link:Banners$ or $link:Banners of Hegemony$ or $link:Cloud Cities$ on a broken world?
+      a: >-
+        Yes! There are enough scraps to build a small bunker, plant a flag, or build in the ashen clouds.
+  card: Breaking Worlds
+- faq:
+    - q: >-
+        For the Imperial Action on the War Policy, am I exempt from giving a resource if the Trust has no Weapons?
+      a: >-
+        No. You have to try to give the maximum amount prompted. So if it has a Weapon but no other resource, give a Weapon. If it has no Weapon but it does have another resource, give the resource.
+  card: Govern with Authority
+- faq:
+    - q: >-
+        When I transfer Lore with resources on it, what happens to the resources?
+      a: >-
+        They remain on the transferred Lore card.
+  card: Knowledge Set Free
+- faq:
+    - q: >-
+        When I scrap Lore with resources on it, what happens to the resources?
+      a: >-
+        They return to the general supply.
+  card: Caretaker Act III Objective
+- faq:
+    - q: >-
+        How does this interact with $link:Psionic Monopoly$?
+      a: >-
+        The consent of the Monopoly holder is still required to give Psionic. As noted on $link:Monopoly Consent$, consent can be forced by returning their Favor in the Call to Order.
+  card: Reconcile with the Outraged
+- faq:
+    - q: >-
+        Where does the Court token go when I secure a card with it?
+      a: >-
+        If you're a Lord, return it to the general supply. If you're a Vassal, keep it on the refilled card.
+  card: Feudal Courts
+- faq:
+    - q: >-
+        If we are playing with split discard piles, where do I scrap from?
+      a: >-
+        The facedown pile. If there is none, shuffle the face-up pile to form a facedown pile first.
+  card: Spreading the Faith