False positive routine

[nkhadka21]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 98.11321% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 97.46%. Comparing base (5cc87c5) to head (d69b6db).
Report is 34 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
slsim/FalsePositives/false_positive_pop.py	95.65%	2 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #273      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   97.39%   97.46%   +0.07%     
==========================================
  Files          71       72       +1     
  Lines        4873     4860      -13     
==========================================
- Hits         4746     4737       -9     
+ Misses        127      123       -4     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
slsim/Deflectors/all_lens_galaxies.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
slsim/Deflectors/cluster_deflectors.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
slsim/Deflectors/compound_lens_halos_galaxies.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
slsim/Deflectors/elliptical_lens_galaxies.py	95.08% <100.00%> (+0.16%)	⬆️
slsim/FalsePositives/false_positive.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
slsim/Sources/galaxies.py	99.32% <100.00%> (+0.03%)	⬆️
slsim/Sources/point_plus_extended_sources.py	100.00% <ø> (ø)
slsim/Sources/point_sources.py	92.85% <100.00%> (+0.54%)	⬆️
slsim/Sources/source_pop_base.py	90.62% <100.00%> (+1.73%)	⬆️
slsim/lens_pop.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 2 more

... and 4 files with indirect coverage changes

[sibirrer]

Thank you @nkhadka21. I have some requests and comments about documentation and structure.

[sibirrer]

Thank you! Now, that's a bit more clear to me, I have some other suggestions to make the code a bit more streamlined.

[sibirrer]

Looks great, thank you very much!