-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Reorganize Iperf error reporting #349
Conversation
30807cb
to
18b2509
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Overall looks fine. Please address my comments. Also, do few test runs on the internal failing iperf test cases where we would benefit from the added logging.
8ec12dd
to
3b9391b
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good.
3b9391b
to
e3775eb
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
just some minor comments to clear up
EDIT: Planning to test this PR. |
SIG_DFL seems to exit the process, but we want the default python handler that raises KeyboardInterrupt instead.
e3775eb
to
e9ac37c
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
looks good now.
still planning to do some tests or is that also done now? |
@olichtne So... I tested this PR but I'm not sure what the behaviour should be exactly... I SSHed into the client agent and tried sending
|
e9ac37c
to
02b03fe
Compare
I added back the signal sending from the |
Description
Improve iperf reporting and reorganize the code a bit.
Tests
J:8583736
- second recipeset contains debug logs.Reviews
@jtluka
Closes: #201