Release v0.5.0

[alexsnaps]

Not a PR to merge, just checking this is correct and we can run the job:

❯ make bundle IMAGE_TAG=v0.5.0 REGISTRY=quay.io VERSION=0.5.0 REPLACES_VERSION=0.4.1 CHANNELS=stable LIMITADOR_OPERATOR_VERSION=0.7.0 AUTHORINO_OPERATOR_VERSION=0.10.0 WASM_SHIM_VERSION=0.3.0

see how this goes...

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #343 (6d706c5) into main (f17aadb) will increase coverage by 0.39%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #343      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   64.64%   65.03%   +0.39%     
==========================================
  Files          35       35              
  Lines        3804     3804              
==========================================
+ Hits         2459     2474      +15     
+ Misses       1147     1134      -13     
+ Partials      198      196       -2     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integration	70.08% <ø> (+0.74%)	⬆️
unit	59.32% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components	Coverage Δ
api/v1beta1 (u)	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg/common (u)	76.92% <ø> (ø)
pkg/istio (u)	30.24% <ø> (ø)
pkg/log (u)	31.81% <ø> (ø)
pkg/reconcilers (u)	33.21% <ø> (ø)
pkg/rlptools (u)	56.46% <ø> (ø)
controllers (i)	70.08% <ø> (+0.74%)	⬆️

see 5 files with indirect coverage changes

[didierofrivia]

something to comment that I'll also add it to the RFC:

The push event that triggers the build of the images are not passing all the params needed. I usually cancel it, then trigger manually the workflow_dispatch "Build Images" with the same params you ran the make bundle

[didierofrivia]

I reckon the manifest failed because of your local version of controller-gen

[guicassolato]

Should we update https://github.com/Kuadrant/kuadrant-operator/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md as well?

[didierofrivia]

Oops, @guicassolato we (royal) forgot to do it the last time, but yes, we should do it

[alexsnaps]

So, I will redo this yet again, but I challenge the usefulness of the changelog in this case...
where/how do we plan on distributing that changelog? If it has no use, I think we should just not have it at all.
I don't know (if at all) where that changelog is currently made available to end users... can someone shed some light?