Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: perhaps using different tokens #54

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 6, 2023
Merged

fix: perhaps using different tokens #54

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 6, 2023

Conversation

andrewwylde
Copy link
Contributor

My suspicion is that auto needs to have one bot to make the PR, and one to approve it. Not 100% sure, but this seems probable.

@andrewwylde andrewwylde added the skip-release Preserve the current version when merged label Oct 6, 2023
Copy link

@devonl-kong devonl-kong left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is starting to get pretty obfuscated with PROTECTED_BRANCH_REVIEWER_TOKEN in the mix. I mean it's worth a shot... If it doesn't work I think we should step back and reassess exactly what it is we want to happen and consider just writing it inline or using different smaller actions

@andrewwylde andrewwylde merged commit 91a949d into main Oct 6, 2023
5 checks passed
@andrewwylde andrewwylde deleted the ci/fixes branch October 6, 2023 20:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
skip-release Preserve the current version when merged
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants