You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
After reading the specs and many discussion threads, I'd suggest following the [attr]="[prop]" system and keeping backwards compatibility to today's title definition:
Everything additional must follow the [attr]="[prop]" standard,
everything else must be in quotation marks and represents the title attribute,
everything else is invalid.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There is a need for implementation of the target attribut for links
Given is a common real-world scenario like this
Currently supported syntax style in CommonMark.Net is at maximum:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4425198/markdown-target-blank already suggests several possible solutions for the different (common) markup versions.
As of above article, the most probably answer might be one of these syntax variants:
Maybe too simple solution ;-)
With Markdown-2.5.2, you can use this:
Some projects use this style of extended attribution: {[attr]="[prop]"}
Kramdown/standard common mark
https://talk.commonmark.org/t/multimarkdown-link-and-reference-image-attributes/1916
http://fletcher.github.io/MultiMarkdown-5/syntax.html#linkandimageattributes
https://talk.commonmark.org/t/links-with-attributes-like-target-class-etc/2246
After reading the specs and many discussion threads, I'd suggest following the
[attr]="[prop]"
system and keeping backwards compatibility to today's title definition:Everything additional must follow the
[attr]="[prop]"
standard,everything else must be in quotation marks and represents the title attribute,
everything else is invalid.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: