chore: updated readme

[Kiwifuit]

Summary by Sourcery

Revise the README to align with the project's new direction as a distributed Minecraft server hosting platform, removing outdated information and plans.

Documentation:

• Update the README to reflect the new project focus on creating a distributed Minecraft server hosting platform.
• Remove outdated sections and plans from the README, including details about the mpcli deletion and potential backend crate merges.

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request updates the README.md file, changing the project title and status of some tasks. It also removes a significant portion of the README content, including sections about project changes, caveats, and technical details.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Updated project title and task status	Changed project title from 'McServer Manager' to 'Distributed Minecraft Server' Updated 'Server backend architecture' task from unchecked to checked	README.md
Removed sections from README	Deleted 'What happened?' section discussing project changes Removed information about potential repository restructuring Deleted 'A few caveats' section with technical details about 'denji'	README.md

---

Tips

• Trigger a new Sourcery review by commenting @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue your discussion with Sourcery by replying directly to review comments.
• You can change your review settings at any time by accessing your dashboard:
  • Enable or disable the Sourcery-generated pull request summary or reviewer's guide;
  • Change the review language;
• You can always contact us if you have any questions or feedback.

[sourcery-ai]

Hey @Kiwifuit - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

Overall Comments:

• Consider updating the PR title to better reflect the significant changes being made, such as the project renaming and removal of substantial content.
• It would be helpful to provide some context in the PR description about why these changes are being made, especially regarding the removal of the project status and caveats sections.

Here's what I looked at during the review

• 🟢 General issues: all looks good
• 🟢 Security: all looks good
• 🟢 Testing: all looks good
• 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
• 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.}