Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

KSM-463 - Python SDK - fix for record's data JSON where "fields": null #525

Conversation

idimov-keeper
Copy link
Collaborator

added test for clients that do not store "fields":[] or set it to null

added test for clients that do not store "fields":[] or set it to null
@maksimu maksimu changed the title fix for record's data JSON where "fields": null KSM-463 - Python SDK - fix for record's data JSON where "fields": null Sep 14, 2023
maksimu
maksimu previously approved these changes Sep 14, 2023
@maksimu maksimu changed the base branch from master to release/sdk/python/core/v16.6.2 September 14, 2023 23:15
@maksimu maksimu merged commit 5dc2d76 into release/sdk/python/core/v16.6.2 Sep 14, 2023
25 of 29 checks passed
idimov-keeper added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 14, 2023
maksimu added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 15, 2023
…per (#527)

* Update Python SDK to version 16.6.2 and updates change log

* KSM-463 - Python SDK - fix for record's data JSON where "fields": null (#525)

* KSM-458 Remove core dep on helper module

Refactor add_custom_field not to use the helper module. The method
will accept an instance of FieldType, however it is not tied to the
keeper_secrets_manager_helper.v3.field_type.FieldType module.

Allow the ability to set the type, label, and value not using the
FieldType instance. The method will still take the param `field`,
however it will also take `field_type`, `label`, and `value`. This
allows adding a custom field without have to use the helper module.

Removed references `keeper-secrets-manager-helper` from setup.py
and requirements.txt. This should break the circular reference.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants