Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: bump dependencies #220

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 2, 2025
Merged

chore: bump dependencies #220

merged 4 commits into from
Jan 2, 2025

Conversation

mbreithecker
Copy link
Member

@mbreithecker mbreithecker commented Dec 31, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Dependency Updates
    • Updated multiple dependencies to their latest versions.
    • Key updates include CometBFT, Prometheus libraries, and various Go standard libraries.
    • Includes minor version upgrades for security, performance, and compatibility improvements.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 31, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request focuses on updating multiple dependencies in the go.mod file to their latest versions. The changes involve upgrading various Go libraries and packages, including CometBFT, database libraries, cryptography packages, logging tools, and system-related modules. These updates span across different domains such as networking, security, monitoring, and system utilities, reflecting a comprehensive refresh of the project's dependency ecosystem.

Changes

File Change Summary
go.mod Updated 17 dependencies, including:
- CometBFT: v0.38.12v0.38.16
- CometBFT DB: v0.11.0v0.14.1
- Decred secp256k1: v4.2.0v4.3.0
- Badger: v2.2007.4v4.2.0
- Docker CLI: v23.0.1+incompatiblev24.0.7+incompatible
- Go kit: v0.12.0v0.13.0
- lib/pq: v1.10.7v1.10.9
- Highwayhash: v1.0.2v1.0.3
- Prometheus client: v1.20.1v1.20.5
- Prometheus common: v0.55.0v0.60.1
- Go deadlock: v0.3.1v0.3.5
- Logrus: v1.9.0v1.9.3
- bbolt: v1.3.10v1.4.0-alpha.0.0.20240404170359-43604f3112c5
- x/crypto: v0.27.0v0.31.0
- x/net: v0.29.0v0.33.0
- x/sync: v0.9.0v0.10.0
- x/sys: v0.25.0v0.28.0
- x/term: v0.24.0v0.27.0
- x/text: v0.20.0v0.21.0

Poem

🐰 Hop, hop, dependencies dance!
Versions leap with every glance
Modules update, code grows bright
Libraries sparkle with new might
A rabbit's code refresh delight! 🚀


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ce00a0f and f1169c3.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
  • go.work.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • go.mod (12 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
go.mod (1)
Learnt from: mbreithecker
PR: KYVENetwork/chain#220
File: go.mod:345-354
Timestamp: 2025-01-02T10:47:02.575Z
Learning: golang.org/x/crypto v0.31.0 lies outside the vulnerable range "< 0.31.0" and should not be flagged as vulnerable.
🔇 Additional comments (6)
go.mod (6)

21-21: LGTM: CometBFT update looks good

The update to github.com/cometbft/cometbft v0.38.16 is a minor version bump that includes stability improvements and bug fixes.


334-334: Review alpha version dependency

The update to go.etcd.io/bbolt v1.4.0-alpha.0.0.20240404170359-43604f3112c5 introduces an alpha version. While this brings new features, it may not be stable for production use.

Would you like me to help create a GitHub issue to track the upgrade to a stable version when it becomes available?


345-354: Security-related package updates look good

The updates to critical security packages are appropriate:

  • golang.org/x/crypto v0.31.0 (not vulnerable as per retrieved learning)
  • golang.org/x/net v0.33.0
  • golang.org/x/sys v0.28.0
  • golang.org/x/text v0.21.0

279-281: Prometheus stack update is consistent

The Prometheus-related packages have been updated consistently:

  • prometheus/client_golang v1.20.5
  • prometheus/common v0.60.1
    This maintains compatibility across the monitoring stack.

104-104: Database and logging dependencies are aligned

The updates to core infrastructure packages are coordinated:

  • cometbft/cometbft-db v0.14.1
  • go-kit/kit v0.13.0
    This maintains consistency across the database and logging layers.

Also applies to: 145-145


121-121: Verify compatibility with major version upgrade

The upgrade from badger/v2 to badger/v4 is a major version change that might include breaking changes.

Run the following script to check for potential breaking changes:

✅ Verification successful

Badger dependency appears to be indirect with no direct usage

Based on the verification results, we can observe that:

  1. The badger dependency is marked as "indirect" in go.mod
  2. No direct imports or usage of badger APIs were found in the codebase
  3. No v2-specific APIs were found that would need migration

Since this is an indirect dependency (likely required by another dependency) and there's no direct usage in the codebase, the major version upgrade should not directly impact the project's code.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for badger v2 to v4 migration impact
# Look for badger-specific API usage that might need updates

# Search for badger DB operations that might need updates
rg -A 3 "badger\." 

# Search for specific v2 APIs that changed in v4
ast-grep --pattern 'badger.Open($_)'

Length of output: 59


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find badger usage

# Find files that import badger
rg -l "github.com/dgraph-io/badger"

# Look for any references to badger in go files
rg -t go "badger" -A 3

# Check git diff to see the version change
git diff HEAD^ HEAD -- go.mod | grep -A 2 -B 2 "badger"

Length of output: 186


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual usage in the codebase

# Search for badger imports in go files
rg -t go "^import.*badger" -B 2 -A 2

# Look for badger.DB or badger.Options usage
rg -t go "badger\.(DB|Options)" -B 2 -A 2

# Check if there are any direct references to v2-specific APIs
rg -t go "badger/v2" 

# Look for any badger initialization or configuration
ast-grep --pattern 'badger.DefaultOptions($$$)'

Length of output: 153


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@mbreithecker mbreithecker marked this pull request as ready for review January 2, 2025 09:58
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between bd859a3 and ce00a0f.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
  • go.work.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • go.mod (11 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
go.mod (4)

Line range hint 379-391: LGTM: Replace directives are properly maintained

The replace directives are well-maintained and include proper documentation for security fixes (GHSA-h395-qcrw-5vmq and GHSA-3vp4-m3rf-835h).


123-123: Verify Docker CLI compatibility

The Docker CLI update (v23.0.1 → v24.0.7) includes a major version bump. Please ensure compatibility with Docker-related operations.

Run the following script to identify Docker CLI usage patterns:

✅ Verification successful

Docker CLI update is safe to proceed

Based on the codebase analysis, the Docker CLI dependency is primarily used in test environments:

  • The main Docker usage is in the interchaintest directory for testing purposes
  • Docker-related code is used for building and testing, not in the core application logic
  • The Docker client is only imported in test files (e.g., interchaintest/upgrades/v1_5/upgrade_test.go)

Additionally, the update from v23.0.1 to v24.0.7 in the main module is marked as indirect, meaning it's not directly used by the application code but is rather a transitive dependency. The actual Docker usage in tests is using a newer version (v24.0.9) which is compatible with the updated CLI version.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for Docker CLI usage patterns

# Search for Docker CLI usage
echo "Checking Docker CLI usage patterns..."
ast-grep --pattern 'docker.$$$'

# Search for specific Docker operations
echo "Checking for Docker operations..."
rg -l "docker" | xargs rg "NewClientWithOpts|ImagePull|ContainerCreate|ContainerStart"

Length of output: 282


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for Docker-related code and imports

# Search for Docker-related imports and usage
echo "Searching for Docker-related imports and code..."
rg -l "github.com/docker" 

echo -e "\nChecking content of files with Docker imports..."
rg -A 5 "github.com/docker"

echo -e "\nSearching for Docker client initialization or usage..."
rg -i "docker|NewClient|ContainerCreate|ImagePull"

Length of output: 14006


121-121: Verify compatibility with Badger v4 upgrade

The upgrade from Badger v2 to v4 is a major version bump that may introduce breaking changes. This requires careful verification of database operations throughout the codebase.

Run the following script to identify potential incompatibilities:


21-21: Verify CometBFT compatibility

The update of both CometBFT (v0.38.12 → v0.38.15) and CometBFT-DB (v0.11.0 → v0.14.1) requires verification of consensus and database compatibility.

Run the following script to check for any breaking changes in consensus or database operations:

Also applies to: 104-104

✅ Verification successful

Let me try a different approach to verify the CometBFT compatibility.


Let me check the actual code usage to better understand the impact.


CometBFT upgrade appears safe for this codebase

Based on the analysis:

  1. The codebase uses CometBFT primarily for ABCI types, crypto, and configuration, which are stable interfaces
  2. The changelog shows no breaking changes between v0.38.12 and v0.38.15:
    • v0.38.15 reverts a Go version change
    • v0.38.14 fixes a security vulnerability in vote extensions
    • v0.38.13 fixes tx_search results with CometBFT-DB v0.13+
  3. No direct CometBFT-DB usage was found in the codebase (it uses cosmos-db instead)

The upgrade should be safe as it includes important security fixes without introducing breaking changes to the interfaces used in this codebase.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for CometBFT and CometBFT-DB usage patterns

# Search for CometBFT consensus-related code
echo "Checking CometBFT consensus patterns..."
ast-grep --pattern 'cometbft.$$$'

# Search for CometBFT-DB usage
echo "Checking CometBFT-DB patterns..."
rg -l "cometbft-db" | xargs rg "NewDB|Get|Set|Delete|Iterator"

Length of output: 365


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the exact version changes in go.mod history
echo "Checking CometBFT version changes..."
git diff HEAD^ HEAD go.mod | grep -A 1 -B 1 "cometbft"

# Look for any CometBFT imports and usage
echo "Checking CometBFT imports..."
rg -l "github.com/cometbft/cometbft" --type go

# Check for any database related imports and usage
echo "Checking DB related imports..."
rg -l "db\." --type go | xargs rg "db\.(Get|Set|Delete|Iterator)"

Length of output: 497


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the actual CometBFT usage in the files
echo "Checking CometBFT usage in app.go..."
rg -A 5 "github.com/cometbft/cometbft" app/app.go

echo "Checking CometBFT usage in test_helpers.go..."
rg -A 5 "github.com/cometbft/cometbft" app/test_helpers.go

echo "Checking CometBFT usage in integration.go..."
rg -A 5 "github.com/cometbft/cometbft" testutil/integration/integration.go

echo "Checking CometBFT usage in config.go..."
rg -A 5 "github.com/cometbft/cometbft" cmd/kyved/cmd/config.go

# Check changelog for breaking changes
echo "Checking CometBFT changelog between versions..."
curl -s https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cometbft/cometbft/v0.38.15/CHANGELOG.md | grep -A 10 "v0.38.1[345]"

Length of output: 3470

go.mod Show resolved Hide resolved
@mbreithecker mbreithecker merged commit 41fe3de into main Jan 2, 2025
4 checks passed
@mbreithecker mbreithecker deleted the mbreithecker/deps branch January 2, 2025 12:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants