-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 115
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Luxor QA Plan #5119
Comments
EnhancementsPost Uprade test
Vesting WG spending
pub static ref NON_RIVALROUS_LOCKS: Vec<LockIdentifier> = [
VotingLockId::get(),
VESTING_LOCK_ID,
InvitedMemberLockId::get(),
BoundStakingAccountLockId::get(),
]
.to_vec();
Correction
|
yeah that info was outdated, I have corrected it ✅ |
Reduce council budgetHappy case proposal: https://168.119.228.195.nip.io/pioneer/#/proposals/preview/1 Too much reduction proposal (created via polkadot.js, pioneer properly validated): https://168.119.228.195.nip.io/pioneer/#/proposals/preview/2 Try to make a proposal with a negative reduction is not possible. The proposal argument is u128 so it's not possible to pass a negative value ✅ Vested spendingHappy case: https://polkadot.js.org/apps/?rpc=wss%3A%2F%2F168.119.228.195.nip.io%2Fws-rpc#/explorer/query/0x945903fb2c797ad6b5ee1e1f872407f347b7a89550cbe0d465a4b1db4d80e689 Bigger spend than WG budget: https://polkadot.js.org/apps/?rpc=wss%3A%2F%2F168.119.228.195.nip.io%2Fws-rpc#/explorer/query/0xfadad2e8cc29876c14ae630723f3e611eeb689c06086e93096cfd9a474c8e4ef Exceeding vesting schedules limit: https://polkadot.js.org/apps/?rpc=wss%3A%2F%2F168.119.228.195.nip.io%2Fws-rpc#/explorer/query/0x56d17c7715defee8c84951eaa52c56a694357729134cdb0316847cfa7aabdc5f Edge case params (per @ignazio-bovo):
LGTM ✅ |
CRT constrains updateUpdate all params: https://168.119.228.195.nip.io/pioneer/#/proposals/preview/6 All good ✅ Update single param: https://168.119.228.195.nip.io/pioneer/#/proposals/preview/7 All good ✅ |
Proxy palletCreated Sent funds via a proxy: https://polkadot.js.org/apps/?rpc=wss%3A%2F%2F168.119.228.195.nip.io%2Fws-rpc#/explorer/query/0xf7656e31621c2c017c88f14b2ac5a478b114baf27a0cc3b244ba5e0529c976ca Properly executed, funds were withdrawn from the proxied account ✅ Created |
Features Tests
Proposal for reducing council budget
Vested spending from WG budgets
Proposal for adjusting validator rewards budget
Proposal for adjusting CRT pallet constraints
max_yearly_rate
min_amm_slope
min_sale_duration
min_revenue_split_duration
min_revenue_split_time_to_start
sale_platform_fee
amm_buy_tx_fees
amm_sell_tx_fees
bloat_bond
Add proxy pallet
WIP
Pre-Upgrade Tests
Post-Upgrade Tests
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: