Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Luxor network upgrade #5114

Open
kdembler opened this issue Mar 25, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Luxor network upgrade #5114

kdembler opened this issue Mar 25, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@kdembler
Copy link
Member

kdembler commented Mar 25, 2024

Description

Luxor will be 3rd runtime upgrade to Joystream network since mainnet. This upgrade is focused on minor improvements to governance and managing DAO budgets.

Timeline

We plan to submit upgrade proposal in term 31, by April 13th. That means we need to finish development and start QA April 6th at latest.

Scope

Proposal for reducing council budget

Background - #3494
Runtime - #5062

Vested spending from WG budgets

Background - #4948
Runtime - #5072

Proposal for adjusting validator rewards budget

Background - #3702
Runtime - #5086

Proposal for adjusting CRT pallet constraints

Background - #5098
Runtime - #5103

Remove Nara migrations

#5115

Add proxy pallet

#5107

Block AMM operations when revenue split is ongoing

#5127

QA

#5119

@thesan
Copy link
Member

thesan commented Mar 26, 2024

Regarding the QA:
TBH I don't fully get the damping factor logic, but in case it affects only the token rewards but not the points I'm worried it might break the reward history calculated on both Pioneer and the polkadotjs app which would be bad since AFAIK these are the 2 main sources of truth regarding validator rewards.

@kdembler
Copy link
Member Author

@thesan the rewards multiplier should indeed only affect the token rewards, not the era points. Could you share more about what that would break?

@mnaamani
Copy link
Member

I added one important item #5115

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants