Remove header and forewarn about possibly misleading statement

JordanMartinez · Jan 9, 2019 · 9fb26b8 · 9fb26b8
1 parent 57f094c
commit 9fb26b8
Showing 1 changed file with 2 additions and 3 deletions.
diff --git a/21-Hello-World/01-FP-Philosophical-Foundations/06-Why-Is-Learning-FP-Hard.md b/21-Hello-World/01-FP-Philosophical-Foundations/06-Why-Is-Learning-FP-Hard.md
@@ -1,8 +1,7 @@
 # Why is Learning Functional Programming Hard?
 
-## You aren't familiar with Category Theory
-
-1. FP languages are heavily based on Category Theory (CT), which is a very abstract field of mathematics, and names its concepts after CT. This implies a lot of unfamiliar jargon that you've never heard of before. Moreover, it can be difficult to understand these concepts due to how abstract they can be.
+1. <del>FP languages are heavily based on Category Theory (CT), which is a very abstract field of mathematics, and names its concepts after CT. This implies a lot of unfamiliar jargon that you've never heard of before. Moreover, it can be difficult to understand these concepts due to how abstract they can be.</del>
+    - This above point might be reinforcing a myth that is wrong. The myth is, "One must know Category Theory to use PureScript/Haskell."
 2. Pure functions are more restrictive than impure ones. It takes a while to learn how to do the same thing in FP code that one does in OO code.
 3. CT makes it possible to solve a problem in a number of different ways. It's easy to get lost in it all due to three levels: