Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix missing phys. stream type in RDF4J writer #220

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 14, 2024
Merged

Fix missing phys. stream type in RDF4J writer #220

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 14, 2024

Conversation

Ostrzyciel
Copy link
Member

Issue: #218

We cannot fix this one in the same way as in Jena, because in RDF4J there is no way to tell apart a triple and a quad in the default graph. Because of that, the RDF4J writer will now default to writing a QUADS stream, unless it's told otherwise.

I've updated the tests and scaladocs accordingly to reflect this.

Issue: #218

We cannot fix this one in the same way as in Jena, because in RDF4J there is no way to tell apart a triple and a quad in the default graph. Because of that, the RDF4J writer will now default to writing a QUADS stream, unless it's told otherwise.

I've updated the tests and scaladocs accordingly to reflect this.
@Ostrzyciel Ostrzyciel merged commit ef32fff into main Nov 14, 2024
4 checks passed
@Ostrzyciel Ostrzyciel deleted the 218-rdf4j branch November 14, 2024 20:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant