Encoder: maybe speed up the node cache (2) #195
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
For jelly-big I saw similar performance, but for jelly-small much worse... Here I've increased the node cache size significantly (hey, it's just an array of pointers, what does that cost in the era of Google Chrome) and made optimized implementations for both caches to avoid doing useless operations.
One parameter less to pass... trivial, but maybe it'll help something.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
For jelly-big I saw similar performance, but for jelly-small much worse...
Here I've increased the node cache size significantly (hey, it's just an array of pointers, what does that cost in the era of Google Chrome) and made optimized implementations for both caches to avoid doing useless operations.