Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove GHC9.2 from CI. Sets 9.6 as default. #416

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 29, 2024

Conversation

carbolymer
Copy link
Contributor

Changelog

- description: |
    - Remove GHC 9.2 GHA workflow
    - Add haddockShell hydra job
# uncomment types applicable to the change:
  type:
  # - feature        # introduces a new feature
  # - breaking       # the API has changed in a breaking way
  # - compatible     # the API has changed but is non-breaking
  # - optimisation   # measurable performance improvements
  # - improvement    # QoL changes e.g. refactoring
  # - bugfix         # fixes a defect
  # - test           # fixes/modifies tests
   - maintenance    # not directly related to the code
  # - release        # related to a new release preparation
  # - documentation  # change in code docs, haddocks...

Context

Additional context for the PR goes here. If the PR fixes a particular issue please provide a link to the issue.

How to trust this PR

Highlight important bits of the PR that will make the review faster. If there are commands the reviewer can run to observe the new behavior, describe them.

Checklist

  • Commit sequence broadly makes sense and commits have useful messages
  • New tests are added if needed and existing tests are updated. See Running tests for more details
  • Self-reviewed the diff

@carbolymer carbolymer force-pushed the mgalazyn/chore/remove-ghc92-from-ci branch from ce1a5c1 to 54ef0ff Compare December 27, 2023 09:34
};
legacyPackages = rec {
}
// { haddockShell = devShells.haddockShell; };
Copy link
Contributor Author

@carbolymer carbolymer Dec 27, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is a new hydra job - builds cache for haddock GHA.

@carbolymer carbolymer force-pushed the mgalazyn/chore/remove-ghc92-from-ci branch from 54ef0ff to cba7ff3 Compare December 27, 2023 10:13
@carbolymer carbolymer changed the title Remove GHC9.2 from CI Remove GHC9.2 from CI. Sets 9.6 as default. Dec 27, 2023
@carbolymer carbolymer force-pushed the mgalazyn/chore/remove-ghc92-from-ci branch 4 times, most recently from 33cb70d to bf569d5 Compare December 28, 2023 10:12
@carbolymer carbolymer force-pushed the mgalazyn/chore/remove-ghc92-from-ci branch 2 times, most recently from 54962ab to 5ce1afe Compare January 24, 2024 13:10
@carbolymer carbolymer enabled auto-merge January 25, 2024 09:17
@carbolymer carbolymer added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 25, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Jan 25, 2024
@carbolymer carbolymer added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 25, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Jan 25, 2024
@carbolymer carbolymer force-pushed the mgalazyn/chore/remove-ghc92-from-ci branch 6 times, most recently from e9852ef to 4fb9175 Compare January 25, 2024 13:05
@carbolymer carbolymer force-pushed the mgalazyn/chore/remove-ghc92-from-ci branch from 4fb9175 to 96dcd82 Compare January 29, 2024 13:19
@carbolymer carbolymer added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 29, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit f1949bf Jan 29, 2024
18 checks passed
@carbolymer carbolymer deleted the mgalazyn/chore/remove-ghc92-from-ci branch January 29, 2024 14:49
newhoggy pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 11, 2024
…tended-descriptions

Extended to non-extended key: write description field in all cases
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants