🎨 [Frontend] Connect Anatomical modes to Licensed items

[odeimaiz]

What do these changes do?

• Connect licensed_items and their pricing plans to ViP Models
• Connect purchases and implement :purchase
• Pricing plans and units: refactoring and own Store
• Talk to iframe, as discussed:

rocket -> osparc

"type": "openMarket",
"message": {
  "category": "human | human_region | animal | phantom",
},

osparc -> rocket

"type": "importModel",
"message": {
  "modelId": 5,
},

Related issue/s

• related to Vendor Specific Resource tracking (VIP service) osparc-issues#1732

How to test

Dev-ops checklist

• No ENV changes or I properly updated ENV (read the instruction)

[pcrespov]

very nice :-)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 82.26%. Comparing base (92ddd6c) to head (436898e).

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (92ddd6c) and HEAD (436898e). Click for more details.

HEAD has 33 uploads less than BASE

Flag	BASE (92ddd6c)	HEAD (436898e)
unittests	31	3
integrationtests	6	1

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #6911      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   88.04%   82.26%   -5.78%     
==========================================
  Files        1590      631     -959     
  Lines       62304    30571   -31733     
  Branches     2008      262    -1746     
==========================================
- Hits        54854    25149   -29705     
+ Misses       7115     5362    -1753     
+ Partials      335       60     -275     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integrationtests	57.76% <ø> (-7.21%)	⬇️
unittests	81.75% <ø> (-4.52%)	⬇️

Components	Coverage Δ
api	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_aws_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_dask_task_models_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_models_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_notifications_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_postgres_database	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_service_integration	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_service_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_settings_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_simcore_sdk	77.37% <ø> (-8.02%)	⬇️
agent	∅ <ø> (∅)
api_server	∅ <ø> (∅)
autoscaling	∅ <ø> (∅)
catalog	∅ <ø> (∅)
clusters_keeper	∅ <ø> (∅)
dask_sidecar	∅ <ø> (∅)
datcore_adapter	∅ <ø> (∅)
director	∅ <ø> (∅)
director_v2	78.75% <ø> (-12.61%)	⬇️
dynamic_scheduler	∅ <ø> (∅)
dynamic_sidecar	88.80% <ø> (-0.95%)	⬇️
efs_guardian	∅ <ø> (∅)
invitations	∅ <ø> (∅)
osparc_gateway_server	∅ <ø> (∅)
payments	∅ <ø> (∅)
resource_usage_tracker	∅ <ø> (∅)
storage	∅ <ø> (∅)
webclient	∅ <ø> (∅)
webserver	82.90% <ø> (-4.56%)	⬇️

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 92ddd6c...436898e. Read the comment docs.

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud