ruby 3.4.1 ruby 3.3.6 (new formula)

[p-linnane]

• Have you followed the guidelines for contributing?
• Have you ensured that your commits follow the commit style guide?
• Have you checked that there aren't other open pull requests for the same formula update/change?
• Have you built your formula locally with HOMEBREW_NO_INSTALL_FROM_API=1 brew install --build-from-source <formula>, where <formula> is the name of the formula you're submitting?
• Is your test running fine brew test <formula>, where <formula> is the name of the formula you're submitting?
• Does your build pass brew audit --strict <formula> (after doing HOMEBREW_NO_INSTALL_FROM_API=1 brew install --build-from-source <formula>)? If this is a new formula, does it pass brew audit --new <formula>?

---

[chenrui333]

• fastlane gem update, fix: add abbrev/mutex_m gems as no longer in ruby 3.4+ fastlane/fastlane#29182
• cucumber v10 would support ruby 3.4, see Got ArgumentError with unknown keyword in Ruby 3.4.0-preview2 cucumber/cucumber-ruby#1769

---

• wrong number of arguments (given 3, expected 2; required keywords: httpool, work_pool, cache gel-rb/gel#134

[p-linnane]

Thanks for all the hard work here @chenrui333!

[carlocab]

Suggest moving gel deprecation to a separate PR so we can merge with 🟢 CI

[chenrui333]

Suggest moving gel deprecation to a separate PR so we can merge with 🟢 CI

gel test actually failed for linux build due to the time out issue (I was thinking the deprecation would ignore the formula), let me move it to a separate pr

just moved the gel deprecation into a separate pr

[p-linnane]

The sonoma bottle for ruby has a hash mismatch. Investigating.

[chenrui333]

yeah, I think we can followup with a rebottle

[carlocab]

Not sure if the right code suggestion was applied: #202443 (comment)

But let's see.

[carlocab]

Rebottled at https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-core/actions/runs/12507715499