Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: change scope of dependabot checks #309

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 2, 2024
Merged

feat: change scope of dependabot checks #309

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 2, 2024

Conversation

Mossman1215
Copy link
Contributor

@Mossman1215 Mossman1215 commented Sep 1, 2024

currently the dependabot configuration is not useful to us the dependabot system is blocked on merging unhelpful PR's for mkdocs

mkdocs will be addressed in this ticket instead https://github.com/GeoNet/tickets/issues/15171

this change scopes python updates to a component service of a data product (arcgis online uploader base image)

hopefully this means we get automation for image updates from the new image sync tooling

currently the dependabot configuration is not useful to us
the dependabot system is blocked on merging unhelpful PR's for mkdocs

mkdocs will be addressed in this ticket instead GeoNet/tickets#15171

this change scopes python updates to a component service of a data product

hopefully this means we get automation for image updates from the new image sync tooling
@Mossman1215 Mossman1215 requested a review from ardrigh September 1, 2024 23:44
Copy link
Contributor

@ardrigh ardrigh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good plan thanks. We can add or adapt these to make the fit as needed

@ardrigh ardrigh merged commit 84abdc6 into main Sep 2, 2024
14 checks passed
@ardrigh ardrigh deleted the dependabot-scoped branch September 2, 2024 02:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants