Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[pkg/inline-mod]: Implements new lazyValue utility #74

Merged
merged 14 commits into from
Apr 19, 2024

Conversation

Fryuni
Copy link
Owner

@Fryuni Fryuni commented Apr 13, 2024

No description provided.

@Fryuni Fryuni requested a review from florian-lefebvre April 13, 2024 20:46
@Fryuni Fryuni self-assigned this Apr 13, 2024
Copy link

vercel bot commented Apr 13, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
inox-tools ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Apr 19, 2024 6:06pm

docs/src/content/docs/inline-mod/lazy.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/src/content/docs/inline-mod/lazy.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/src/content/docs/inline-mod/lazy.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Fryuni and others added 2 commits April 18, 2024 19:03
Co-authored-by: Bryce Russell <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Florian Lefebvre <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Luiz Ferraz <[email protected]>
Copy link
Collaborator

@BryceRussell BryceRussell left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The examples help a ton, LGTM!

docs/src/content/docs/inline-mod/lazy.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Bryce Russell <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Luiz Ferraz <[email protected]>
@Fryuni Fryuni merged commit 7cc941f into main Apr 19, 2024
14 checks passed
@Fryuni Fryuni deleted the feat/lazy-value-inline-mod branch April 19, 2024 20:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants