-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
change used zip lib #24
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Warning Rate limit exceeded@MatteoDelOmbra has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 25 minutes and 30 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces updates to two components, Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
Frends.Zip.ExtractArchive/Frends.Zip.ExtractArchive/Frends.Zip.ExtractArchive.csproj (1)
27-27
: Ensure comprehensive testing after library switchSwitching ZIP libraries is a significant change that requires:
- Comprehensive testing of all ZIP extraction scenarios
- Verification of backward compatibility with existing archives
- Performance comparison with the previous implementation
- Documentation updates to reflect any API changes
Consider adding integration tests that cover various archive formats and edge cases.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
Frends.Zip.CreateArchive/CHANGELOG.md
(1 hunks)Frends.Zip.CreateArchive/Frends.Zip.CreateArchive/Frends.Zip.CreateArchive.csproj
(2 hunks)Frends.Zip.ExtractArchive/CHANGELOG.md
(1 hunks)Frends.Zip.ExtractArchive/Frends.Zip.ExtractArchive/Frends.Zip.ExtractArchive.csproj
(2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- Frends.Zip.CreateArchive/CHANGELOG.md
🔇 Additional comments (4)
Frends.Zip.ExtractArchive/Frends.Zip.ExtractArchive/Frends.Zip.ExtractArchive.csproj (1)
27-27
: Verify the security and stability of ProDotNetZip
While the switch from DotNetZip is motivated by security concerns, we should verify:
- The legitimacy and maintenance status of the ProDotNetZip package
- Whether version 1.20.0 is the latest stable release
- Any known security vulnerabilities in this version
✅ Verification successful
Update to the latest version 1.20.0 is appropriate and secure
The verification results show:
- ProDotNetZip is actively maintained with regular releases (5 versions in 2024)
- Version 1.20.0 (December 5, 2024) is indeed the latest version
- A HIGH severity directory traversal vulnerability was found in versions < 1.19.0
- The vulnerability has been patched in version 1.19.0 and later
- The PR is using version 1.20.0, which is secure against the known vulnerability
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify ProDotNetZip package information and security status
# Check NuGet package information
curl -s https://api.nuget.org/v3/registration5-semver1/prodotnetzip/index.json | jq '.items[0].items[].catalogEntry | {version, published}'
# Check GitHub security advisories
gh api graphql -f query='
{
securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: NUGET, package: "ProDotNetZip") {
nodes {
advisory {
summary
severity
publishedAt
}
vulnerableVersionRange
firstPatchedVersion {
identifier
}
}
}
}'
Length of output: 1063
Frends.Zip.CreateArchive/Frends.Zip.CreateArchive/Frends.Zip.CreateArchive.csproj (2)
14-14
: LGTM! Version bump follows semantic versioning
The patch version increment (1.1.0 → 1.1.1) is appropriate for a security-related library change.
27-27
: Verify the security and compatibility of ProDotNetZip
While addressing security concerns is important, we need to verify several aspects of this library change:
Please ensure:
- This is the latest stable version of ProDotNetZip
- The library maintains API compatibility with DotNetZip
- No known vulnerabilities exist in version 1.20.0
- Integration tests pass with the new library
Consider documenting the security concerns that prompted this change in the changelog or commit message for future reference.
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the API usage to ensure compatibility before making a final decision.
Package change to ProDotNetZip 1.20.0 is appropriate and secure
The switch to ProDotNetZip is justified based on the following findings:
- It's a legitimate fork of DotNetZip specifically focused on fixing vulnerabilities and .NET Standard compatibility
- Version 1.20.0 is the latest available version
- It's safe from the known high-severity directory traversal vulnerability (patched in 1.19.0)
- The API compatibility is maintained as both packages use the same
Ionic.Zip
namespace - The change is consistently applied across related packages (CreateArchive and ExtractArchive)
- The changelog explicitly mentions this change was made "because of security reasons"
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the ProDotNetZip package information and potential security issues
# Check if ProDotNetZip is a legitimate package and get its details
curl -s "https://api.nuget.org/v3/registration5-semver1/prodotnetzip/index.json" | jq -r '.items[0].items[0].catalogEntry | {description, authors, projectUrl, tags}'
# Check if there's a newer version available
curl -s "https://api.nuget.org/v3/registration5-semver1/prodotnetzip/index.json" | jq -r '.items[0].upper'
# Search for any security advisories
gh api graphql -f query='
{
securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: NUGET, package: "ProDotNetZip") {
nodes {
advisory {
summary
severity
publishedAt
}
vulnerableVersionRange
firstPatchedVersion {
identifier
}
}
}
}'
# Check for any breaking changes by looking for API changes in the codebase
rg -A 5 "DotNetZip"
Length of output: 3371
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the API usage in both packages to verify compatibility
rg -B 2 -A 2 "Ionic\.Zip" .
# Look for any test files that might show usage patterns
fd -e cs -e fs test
Length of output: 2633
Frends.Zip.ExtractArchive/CHANGELOG.md (1)
3-5
: LGTM! Changelog entry follows proper format.
The changelog entry follows the Keep a Changelog format and clearly states the change made.
Frends.Zip.ExtractArchive/Frends.Zip.ExtractArchive/Frends.Zip.ExtractArchive.csproj
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Frends.Zip.CreateArchive/Frends.Zip.CreateArchive/Frends.Zip.CreateArchive.csproj
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Frends.Zip.ExtractArchive/Frends.Zip.ExtractArchive/Frends.Zip.ExtractArchive.csproj
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Frends.Zip.ExtractArchive/Frends.Zip.ExtractArchive/Frends.Zip.ExtractArchive.csproj
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
Frends.Zip.ExtractArchive/CHANGELOG.md (1)
6-6
: Fix typo in "deprecated"There's a typo in the word "depracated" which should be "deprecated".
-- DotNetZip has a HIGH severity directory traversal vulnerability (CVE reported Nov 2024) affecting versions 1.10.1 through 1.16.0 with no patch available (package is depracated) ++ DotNetZip has a HIGH severity directory traversal vulnerability (CVE reported Nov 2024) affecting versions 1.10.1 through 1.16.0 with no patch available (package is deprecated)Frends.Zip.CreateArchive/Frends.Zip.CreateArchive/Frends.Zip.CreateArchive.csproj (1)
15-15
: Consider using a more specific package URLWhile the generic Frends URL is valid, consider using a more specific URL pointing to this package's documentation or repository section for better discoverability.
- <PackageProjectUrl>https://frends.com/</PackageProjectUrl> + <PackageProjectUrl>https://github.com/FrendsPlatform/Frends.ZIP/tree/main/Frends.Zip.CreateArchive</PackageProjectUrl>Frends.Zip.CreateArchive/CHANGELOG.md (1)
6-6
: Fix typo in "deprecated"There's a typo in the word "depracated".
-- DotNetZip has a HIGH severity directory traversal vulnerability (CVE reported Nov 2024) affecting versions 1.10.1 through 1.16.0 with no patch available (package is depracated) ++ DotNetZip has a HIGH severity directory traversal vulnerability (CVE reported Nov 2024) affecting versions 1.10.1 through 1.16.0 with no patch available (package is deprecated)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
Frends.Zip.CreateArchive/CHANGELOG.md
(1 hunks)Frends.Zip.CreateArchive/Frends.Zip.CreateArchive/Frends.Zip.CreateArchive.csproj
(2 hunks)Frends.Zip.ExtractArchive/CHANGELOG.md
(1 hunks)Frends.Zip.ExtractArchive/Frends.Zip.ExtractArchive/Frends.Zip.ExtractArchive.csproj
(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- Frends.Zip.ExtractArchive/Frends.Zip.ExtractArchive/Frends.Zip.ExtractArchive.csproj
🔇 Additional comments (4)
Frends.Zip.ExtractArchive/CHANGELOG.md (1)
3-8
: LGTM! Comprehensive changelog entry with security context.
The changelog entry effectively documents the migration to ProDotNetZip with clear security rationale and version details.
Frends.Zip.CreateArchive/Frends.Zip.CreateArchive/Frends.Zip.CreateArchive.csproj (2)
13-13
: Version bump to 1.2.0 is appropriate
The version increment is justified given the security-driven migration to a different ZIP library.
26-26
: Verify ProDotNetZip migration impact
The switch from DotNetZip to ProDotNetZip is a good security measure. However, let's verify:
- API compatibility between the libraries
- Impact on existing functionality
- Latest stable version availability
Consider adding migration notes to the changelog and documentation to help users understand the impact of this change.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the actual usage to verify the compatibility.
Migration to ProDotNetZip is safe and compatible
The verification shows that the migration from DotNetZip to ProDotNetZip is safe because:
- ProDotNetZip is a maintained fork of DotNetZip that maintains API compatibility
- The codebase uses standard DotNetZip APIs (
ZipFile
,Ionic.Zip
namespace) which are preserved in ProDotNetZip - The changelog confirms this is a security-driven change to address a HIGH severity directory traversal vulnerability (CVE from Nov 2024)
- All core functionality is covered by comprehensive unit tests that verify:
- Basic zip operations
- Password protection
- File flattening
- Duplicate handling
- Recursive operations
The migration requires no code changes as ProDotNetZip maintains full API compatibility with DotNetZip.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for usage of DotNetZip-specific APIs that might need updates
rg -l "using\s+Ionic\.Zip"
# Look for ZIP-related operations that might need verification
ast-grep --pattern 'new ZipFile($$$)'
# Check for any remaining DotNetZip references
rg -l "DotNetZip"
# Look for test files to ensure test coverage
fd -e cs -e fs test
Length of output: 1020
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the actual implementation in CreateArchive.cs
cat Frends.Zip.CreateArchive/Frends.Zip.CreateArchive/CreateArchive.cs
# Check the unit tests to understand usage patterns
cat Frends.Zip.CreateArchive/Frends.Zip.CreateArchive.Tests/UnitTests.cs
# Check changelog for migration notes
cat Frends.Zip.CreateArchive/CHANGELOG.md
Length of output: 19586
Frends.Zip.CreateArchive/CHANGELOG.md (1)
5-7
: Enhance security documentation
While the security concern is well documented, consider adding:
- The specific CVE identifier for better tracking
- A link to the security advisory
- A brief migration guide for users updating from DotNetZip to ProDotNetZip
This additional information would help users understand the impact and transition process better.
Let me check if the CVE details are publicly available:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Frends.Zip.CreateArchive
andFrends.Zip.ExtractArchive
to version 1.2.0.Frends.Zip.CreateArchive
andFrends.Zip.ExtractArchive
.Bug Fixes
Chores