-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Frends.DownloadObject method update from ListObjectsAsync() to ListObjectsV2Async() #25
Conversation
Warning Rate limit exceeded@helvertti has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 7 minutes and 50 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve updates to the Changes
Possibly related issues
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 3
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
Frends.AmazonS3.DownloadObject/CHANGELOG.md
(1 hunks)Frends.AmazonS3.DownloadObject/Frends.AmazonS3.DownloadObject/DownloadObject.cs
(2 hunks)Frends.AmazonS3.DownloadObject/Frends.AmazonS3.DownloadObject/Frends.AmazonS3.DownloadObject.csproj
(2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- Frends.AmazonS3.DownloadObject/CHANGELOG.md
🔇 Additional comments (2)
Frends.AmazonS3.DownloadObject/Frends.AmazonS3.DownloadObject/Frends.AmazonS3.DownloadObject.csproj (2)
5-5
: Version bump to 2.2.0 is appropriate
The version increment from 2.1.0 to 2.2.0 aligns well with semantic versioning given the feature enhancement (ListObjectsV2Async) and improved compatibility with directory buckets.
25-26
: Verify compatibility with major AWS SDK updates
The significant version jumps in AWS SDK packages (Core: 3.7.10.11 → 3.7.400.61, S3: 3.7.8.23 → 3.7.410.3) warrant careful verification:
Consider the following recommendations:
- Review the AWS SDK for .NET Migration Guide
- Test thoroughly with both regular and directory bucket types
- Verify that all S3 operations still work as expected
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more specific information about the AWS SDK usage to verify if there are any breaking changes in the implementation.
AWS SDK update is safe to proceed
The code analysis shows that the DownloadObject component uses standard AWS SDK patterns that are stable across versions:
- Basic S3 client initialization with credentials and region endpoint
- Standard GetObjectAsync operation with GetObjectRequest
- RegionEndpoint enumeration usage for region selection
- No deprecated or removed API features are being used
The implementation relies on core S3 functionality that has remained consistent in the AWS SDK for .NET, and the version update doesn't introduce breaking changes that would affect the current usage patterns.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for breaking changes and compatibility issues in AWS SDK updates
# Search for AWS SDK initialization and usage patterns
echo "Checking AWS SDK usage patterns..."
rg -l "AmazonS3Client|IAmazonS3|AWSCredentials" --type cs
# Look for potential breaking changes in configuration
echo "Checking configuration patterns..."
rg -l "AWSConfigsS3|ClientConfig|AWSOptions" --type cs
# Search for custom S3 operations that might be affected
echo "Checking S3 operations..."
ast-grep --pattern 'ListObjectsAsync|GetObjectAsync|PutObjectAsync|DeleteObjectAsync'
# Look for AWS credential handling that might need updates
echo "Checking credential handling..."
rg -l "AWSCredentials|BasicAWSCredentials|EnvironmentVariablesAWSCredentials" --type cs
Length of output: 2691
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check specific AWS SDK usage patterns in the DownloadObject component
# Look for S3 client initialization and configuration
echo "Checking S3 client initialization in DownloadObject:"
rg -A 5 "new AmazonS3Client" Frends.AmazonS3.DownloadObject/
# Check for specific S3 operations being used
echo "Checking S3 operations in DownloadObject:"
rg -A 5 "GetObjectAsync|GetObjectMetadataAsync" Frends.AmazonS3.DownloadObject/
# Check for any custom configurations or options
echo "Checking for AWS configurations:"
rg -A 5 "RegionEndpoint|ClientConfig|ServiceURL" Frends.AmazonS3.DownloadObject/
# Check test implementations for potential breaking changes
echo "Checking test implementations:"
rg -A 5 "Mock<IAmazonS3>|GetObjectResponse|GetObjectRequest" Frends.AmazonS3.DownloadObject/
Length of output: 10767
The task was using ListObjectsAsync -method to list objects from the bucket before the download. This does not support directory buckets, which led to an error when the bucket type was directory.
As the fix the method was updated to ListObjectsV2Async -method instead and task libraries were updated.
Original description in the issue: #24
The DeleteSourceFile method was also updated, because of a type error in "has been deleted" check.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
SingleResultObject
for improved data handling.Bug Fixes
Improvements
Dependencies