Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove sepolia #25

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 11, 2024
Merged

Remove sepolia #25

merged 2 commits into from
Nov 11, 2024

Conversation

Alex-Dovgopoly
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

babchenko
babchenko previously approved these changes Nov 11, 2024
@babchenko babchenko changed the base branch from master to dev November 11, 2024 11:17
@babchenko babchenko dismissed their stale review November 11, 2024 11:17

The base branch was changed.

@babchenko babchenko changed the base branch from dev to master November 11, 2024 11:18
'WETH',
'Wrapped ETH'
),
[ChainId.LISK]: new Token(ChainId.LISK, '0x4200000000000000000000000000000000000006', 18, 'WETH', 'Wrapped ETH')

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it intentional to remove LISK config.

Copy link

@babchenko babchenko Nov 11, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, we removed DEX for lisk at all

@@ -5,9 +5,7 @@ export type BigintIsh = JSBI | bigint | string

export enum ChainId {
XDC = 50,
AXDC = 51,
SEPOLIA = 11155111,
LISK = 1135

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it intentional to remove LISK config.

@TonioMacaronio TonioMacaronio merged commit 94f863f into master Nov 11, 2024
9 checks passed
@Alex-Dovgopoly Alex-Dovgopoly deleted the remove-sepolia branch November 11, 2024 11:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants