Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

implement hadolint #9839

Closed

Conversation

manuel-sommer
Copy link
Contributor

@manuel-sommer manuel-sommer commented Mar 27, 2024

Implement a github action for hadolint when you do a change in your PR in a dockerfile.

https://github.com/jbergstroem/hadolint-gh-action/blob/main/USAGE.md

Copy link

Hi there 👋, @DryRunSecurity here, below is a summary of our analysis and findings.

DryRun Security Status Findings
Sensitive Functions Analyzer 0 findings
Configured Sensitive Files Analyzer 0 findings
Sensitive Files Analyzer 0 findings

Note

🟢 Risk threshold not exceeded.

Tip

Get answers to your security questions. Add a comment in this PR starting with @DryRunSecurity. For example...

@dryrunsecurity What are common security issues with web application cookies?

Powered by DryRun Security

@manuel-sommer
Copy link
Contributor Author

Reminder, do we want to implement this @mtesauro and @Maffooch ?

@mtesauro
Copy link
Contributor

@manuel-sommer I'd like to wait at least until after 2.38.0 so that we no longer have MySQL and RabbitMQ in play and the dockerfiles have been adjusted for those deprecations.

I'm trying to avoid double work if possible.

@manuel-sommer
Copy link
Contributor Author

Reminder @mtesauro

@Maffooch
Copy link
Contributor

Let's reopen this after the image hardening and simplification is completed

@Maffooch Maffooch closed this Nov 15, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants