-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
✨ merge veracode #9468
✨ merge veracode #9468
Conversation
Contextual Security AnalysisAs DryRun Security performs checks, we’ll summarize them here. You can always dive into the detailed results in the section below for checks.
Chat with your AI-powered Security Buddy by typing Install and configure more repositories at DryRun Security |
@Maffooch, the unittests with "fixtures = ['dojo_testdata.json']" fail because dojo_testdata.json contains Veracode Scan, but I don't know the real cause why it fails. What do I have to do to fix the unittests? |
I think the failing tests could be related to the creation of the Also curious about the |
Then, I will just fix the failing tests.
The Veracode Source Clear Scan is in the migration as the exisiting Veracode Source Clear Scan parser is migrated to Veracode Scan to have one parser for the vendor Veracode with multiple scanners. This is also what I have done in the past with e.g. OpenVAS CSV and OpenVAS XML or Clair Klar Scan and Clair Scan |
@manuel-sommer I do not see anything glaringly obvious here. I can try to make some in the future to pull this down and just play around with it, but I cannot make strong commitment to that |
8906c43
to
1181ba8
Compare
merge veracode source clear with veracode