Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ruff: add and fix some SIM rules #10926

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 27, 2024
Merged

Ruff: add and fix some SIM rules #10926

merged 2 commits into from
Nov 27, 2024

Conversation

kiblik
Copy link
Contributor

@kiblik kiblik commented Sep 17, 2024

There are many SIM rules, it was easier to exclude some specific

https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/rules/#flake8-simplify-sim

Original #10112 was accidently closed and reopening wasn't possible.

@kiblik kiblik changed the title Ruff sim Ruff: add and fix some SIM rules Sep 17, 2024
Copy link

dryrunsecurity bot commented Sep 17, 2024

DryRun Security Summary

The pull request covers a wide range of functionality improvements in the Defect Dojo application, with a focus on enhancing security-related aspects such as input validation, authorization checks, and database query optimization.

Expand for full summary

Summary:

The code changes in this pull request cover a wide range of functionality within the Defect Dojo application, including improvements to the handling of findings, engagements, endpoints, notifications, and various other features. From an application security perspective, the changes generally focus on enhancing security-related aspects, such as improving input validation, implementing robust authorization checks, and optimizing database queries.

Key security-related changes include:

  1. Strengthening the validation and handling of user input, particularly for sensitive data like Jira integration, vulnerability IDs, and endpoint data.
  2. Enhancing the authorization and access control mechanisms to ensure users only have access to the resources they are permitted to view.
  3. Improving the reliability and security of the notification system, including support for asynchronous task handling and robust error handling.
  4. Optimizing database queries and reducing the number of unnecessary operations to improve the overall performance and security of the application.

Overall, the changes in this pull request appear to be a positive step towards improving the security and reliability of the Defect Dojo application. However, it's important to continue reviewing the entire codebase and the application's security posture to identify and address any potential vulnerabilities or areas for further improvement.

Files Changed:

  1. dojo/benchmark/views.py: The changes focus on handling exceptions during the creation of benchmark products, which does not introduce any significant security concerns.
  2. dojo/authorization/authorization.py: The changes improve the authorization logic and expand the coverage of the system to handle a wider range of object types, which is a positive security enhancement.
  3. dojo/cred/queries.py: The changes simplify the logic for retrieving authorized credential mappings, but it's important to ensure that the function is properly validated and secured against potential vulnerabilities.
  4. dojo/api_v2/serializers.py: The changes focus on improving the serialization and validation of various entities, which can have a positive impact on the overall application security.
  5. dojo/api_v2/views.py: The changes enhance the security and functionality of the API, particularly around object-based authorization and metadata management.
  6. dojo/endpoint/utils.py: The changes optimize the handling of endpoints and improve the robustness of the application, without introducing any obvious security concerns.
  7. dojo/endpoint/queries.py: The changes simplify the logic for retrieving authorized endpoints and endpoint statuses, which is a positive security enhancement.
  8. dojo/cred/views.py: The changes introduce the use of contextlib.suppress() to handle exceptions, which is a common practice but should be reviewed for potential security implications.
  9. dojo/endpoint/views.py: The changes focus on improving the endpoint-related functionality, including the handling of vulnerable endpoints, which is an important security-related feature.
  10. dojo/finding/queries.py: The changes optimize the retrieval of authorized findings and vulnerability IDs, which is a positive security enhancement.
  11. dojo/finding/helper.py: The changes update the handling of findings, including the removal of a check for whether the customer has placed an order, which should be reviewed for potential business and user experience implications.
  12. dojo/engagement/views.py: The changes focus on improving the integration with the JIRA system, which is an important security-related feature.
  13. dojo/finding_group/views.py: The changes handle the association of JIRA issues with finding groups, which should be reviewed for potential security implications.
  14. dojo/finding_group/queries.py: The changes simplify the retrieval of authorized finding groups, which is a positive security enhancement.
  15. dojo/finding/views.py: The changes provide a comprehensive set of functionalities for managing findings, including security-related features like closing, reopening, and merging findings.
  16. dojo/importers/auto_create_context.py: The changes remove a None check, which could potentially introduce a vulnerability if the input data is not properly validated.
  17. dojo/importers/options.py: The changes simplify the validation of import options, which does not introduce any obvious security concerns.
  18. dojo/forms.py: The changes focus on improving the validation of user input, particularly for endpoints and API scan configurations, which is a positive security enhancement.
  19. dojo/group/utils.py: The changes simplify the generation of authorization group names, but it's important to ensure that the overall user management and authorization functionality is secure.
  20. `

Code Analysis

We ran 9 analyzers against 30 files and 1 analyzer had findings. 8 analyzers had no findings.

Analyzer Findings
Authn/Authz Analyzer 4 findings

Riskiness

🟢 Risk threshold not exceeded.

View PR in the DryRun Dashboard.

Copy link
Contributor

@mtesauro mtesauro left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approved

Copy link
Contributor

This pull request has conflicts, please resolve those before we can evaluate the pull request.

Copy link
Contributor

Conflicts have been resolved. A maintainer will review the pull request shortly.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 8, 2024

Conflicts have been resolved. A maintainer will review the pull request shortly.

Copy link
Contributor

This pull request has conflicts, please resolve those before we can evaluate the pull request.

Copy link
Contributor

Conflicts have been resolved. A maintainer will review the pull request shortly.

@kiblik kiblik force-pushed the ruff_sim branch 2 times, most recently from 2c159bb to 34601b0 Compare November 3, 2024 10:13
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request has conflicts, please resolve those before we can evaluate the pull request.

Copy link
Contributor

Conflicts have been resolved. A maintainer will review the pull request shortly.

Copy link
Contributor

This pull request has conflicts, please resolve those before we can evaluate the pull request.

Copy link
Contributor

Conflicts have been resolved. A maintainer will review the pull request shortly.

Copy link
Contributor

This pull request has conflicts, please resolve those before we can evaluate the pull request.

Copy link
Contributor

Conflicts have been resolved. A maintainer will review the pull request shortly.

Copy link
Contributor

This pull request has conflicts, please resolve those before we can evaluate the pull request.

Copy link
Contributor

Conflicts have been resolved. A maintainer will review the pull request shortly.

@kiblik kiblik requested a review from Maffooch November 26, 2024 08:45
@Maffooch Maffooch merged commit fe28476 into DefectDojo:dev Nov 27, 2024
73 checks passed
@kiblik kiblik deleted the ruff_sim branch November 27, 2024 18:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants