Backport protocol 3.11 #144
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…emory reclamation.
cboulay
force-pushed
the
backport_7.06_proto
branch
from
679bfb0 to
e9f6fcd
Compare
cboulay
force-pushed
the
backport_7.06_proto
branch
from
d46b273 to
8999d64
Compare
…king as slave to Central.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This adds an option to set a preprocessor directive
CBPROTO_311and, when it is set, CereLink will be compatible with protocol 3.11 (found on firmwares 7.0x).Fixes #141
I will not be adding Python support to the 3.11 support, so I may never merge this PR. I'll keep this PR here though to rebase when master changes.
TODO:
Modify CI script for additional<-- Not in this PR.-DCBPROTO_311=ONbuilds with well-named artifactscerebus.cbpy built for protocol 3.11<-- I do not plan on doing this