forked from rust-lang/rust-clippy
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Auto merge of rust-lang#10616 - y21:missing_field_in_debug, r=Alexendoo
new lint: `missing_fields_in_debug` Fixes rust-lang#10429 This PR adds a new lint that looks for manual `Debug` implementations that do not "use" all of the fields. This often happens when adding a new field to a struct. It also acts as a style lint in case leaving out a field was intentional. In that case, it's preferred to use [`DebugStruct::finish_non_exhaustive`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/fmt/struct.DebugStruct.html#method.finish_non_exhaustive), which indicates that there are more fields that were explicitly not shown. ``` changelog: [`missing_fields_in_debug`]: missing fields in manual `Debug` implementation ```
- Loading branch information
Showing
7 changed files
with
504 additions
and
0 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,234 @@ | ||
| use std::ops::ControlFlow; | ||
|
|
||
| use clippy_utils::{ | ||
| diagnostics::span_lint_and_then, | ||
| is_path_lang_item, paths, | ||
| ty::match_type, | ||
| visitors::{for_each_expr, Visitable}, | ||
| }; | ||
| use rustc_ast::LitKind; | ||
| use rustc_data_structures::fx::FxHashSet; | ||
| use rustc_hir::Block; | ||
| use rustc_hir::{ | ||
| def::{DefKind, Res}, | ||
| Expr, ImplItemKind, LangItem, Node, | ||
| }; | ||
| use rustc_hir::{ExprKind, Impl, ItemKind, QPath, TyKind}; | ||
| use rustc_hir::{ImplItem, Item, VariantData}; | ||
| use rustc_lint::{LateContext, LateLintPass}; | ||
| use rustc_middle::ty::Ty; | ||
| use rustc_middle::ty::TypeckResults; | ||
| use rustc_session::{declare_lint_pass, declare_tool_lint}; | ||
| use rustc_span::{sym, Span, Symbol}; | ||
|
|
||
| declare_clippy_lint! { | ||
| /// ### What it does | ||
| /// Checks for manual [`core::fmt::Debug`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/core/fmt/trait.Debug.html) implementations that do not use all fields. | ||
| /// | ||
| /// ### Why is this bad? | ||
| /// A common mistake is to forget to update manual `Debug` implementations when adding a new field | ||
| /// to a struct or a new variant to an enum. | ||
| /// | ||
| /// At the same time, it also acts as a style lint to suggest using [`core::fmt::DebugStruct::finish_non_exhaustive`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/core/fmt/struct.DebugStruct.html#method.finish_non_exhaustive) | ||
| /// for the times when the user intentionally wants to leave out certain fields (e.g. to hide implementation details). | ||
| /// | ||
| /// ### Known problems | ||
| /// This lint works based on the `DebugStruct` helper types provided by the `Formatter`, | ||
| /// so this won't detect `Debug` impls that use the `write!` macro. | ||
| /// Oftentimes there is more logic to a `Debug` impl if it uses `write!` macro, so it tries | ||
| /// to be on the conservative side and not lint in those cases in an attempt to prevent false positives. | ||
| /// | ||
| /// This lint also does not look through function calls, so calling a function does not consider fields | ||
| /// used inside of that function as used by the `Debug` impl. | ||
| /// | ||
| /// Lastly, it also ignores tuple structs as their `DebugTuple` formatter does not have a `finish_non_exhaustive` | ||
| /// method, as well as enums because their exhaustiveness is already checked by the compiler when matching on the enum, | ||
| /// making it much less likely to accidentally forget to update the `Debug` impl when adding a new variant. | ||
| /// | ||
| /// ### Example | ||
| /// ```rust | ||
| /// use std::fmt; | ||
| /// struct Foo { | ||
| /// data: String, | ||
| /// // implementation detail | ||
| /// hidden_data: i32 | ||
| /// } | ||
| /// impl fmt::Debug for Foo { | ||
| /// fn fmt(&self, formatter: &mut fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> fmt::Result { | ||
| /// formatter | ||
| /// .debug_struct("Foo") | ||
| /// .field("data", &self.data) | ||
| /// .finish() | ||
| /// } | ||
| /// } | ||
| /// ``` | ||
| /// Use instead: | ||
| /// ```rust | ||
| /// use std::fmt; | ||
| /// struct Foo { | ||
| /// data: String, | ||
| /// // implementation detail | ||
| /// hidden_data: i32 | ||
| /// } | ||
| /// impl fmt::Debug for Foo { | ||
| /// fn fmt(&self, formatter: &mut fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> fmt::Result { | ||
| /// formatter | ||
| /// .debug_struct("Foo") | ||
| /// .field("data", &self.data) | ||
| /// .finish_non_exhaustive() | ||
| /// } | ||
| /// } | ||
| /// ``` | ||
| #[clippy::version = "1.70.0"] | ||
| pub MISSING_FIELDS_IN_DEBUG, | ||
| pedantic, | ||
| "missing fields in manual `Debug` implementation" | ||
| } | ||
| declare_lint_pass!(MissingFieldsInDebug => [MISSING_FIELDS_IN_DEBUG]); | ||
|
|
||
| fn report_lints(cx: &LateContext<'_>, span: Span, span_notes: Vec<(Span, &'static str)>) { | ||
| span_lint_and_then( | ||
| cx, | ||
| MISSING_FIELDS_IN_DEBUG, | ||
| span, | ||
| "manual `Debug` impl does not include all fields", | ||
| |diag| { | ||
| for (span, note) in span_notes { | ||
| diag.span_note(span, note); | ||
| } | ||
| diag.help("consider including all fields in this `Debug` impl") | ||
| .help("consider calling `.finish_non_exhaustive()` if you intend to ignore fields"); | ||
| }, | ||
| ); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| /// Checks if we should lint in a block of code | ||
| /// | ||
| /// The way we check for this condition is by checking if there is | ||
| /// a call to `Formatter::debug_struct` but no call to `.finish_non_exhaustive()`. | ||
| fn should_lint<'tcx>( | ||
| cx: &LateContext<'tcx>, | ||
| typeck_results: &TypeckResults<'tcx>, | ||
| block: impl Visitable<'tcx>, | ||
| ) -> bool { | ||
| // Is there a call to `DebugStruct::finish_non_exhaustive`? Don't lint if there is. | ||
| let mut has_finish_non_exhaustive = false; | ||
| // Is there a call to `DebugStruct::debug_struct`? Do lint if there is. | ||
| let mut has_debug_struct = false; | ||
|
|
||
| for_each_expr(block, |expr| { | ||
| if let ExprKind::MethodCall(path, recv, ..) = &expr.kind { | ||
| let recv_ty = typeck_results.expr_ty(recv).peel_refs(); | ||
|
|
||
| if path.ident.name == sym::debug_struct && match_type(cx, recv_ty, &paths::FORMATTER) { | ||
| has_debug_struct = true; | ||
| } else if path.ident.name == sym!(finish_non_exhaustive) && match_type(cx, recv_ty, &paths::DEBUG_STRUCT) { | ||
| has_finish_non_exhaustive = true; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| ControlFlow::<!, _>::Continue(()) | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| !has_finish_non_exhaustive && has_debug_struct | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| /// Checks if the given expression is a call to `DebugStruct::field` | ||
| /// and the first argument to it is a string literal and if so, returns it | ||
| /// | ||
| /// Example: `.field("foo", ....)` returns `Some("foo")` | ||
| fn as_field_call<'tcx>( | ||
| cx: &LateContext<'tcx>, | ||
| typeck_results: &TypeckResults<'tcx>, | ||
| expr: &Expr<'_>, | ||
| ) -> Option<Symbol> { | ||
| if let ExprKind::MethodCall(path, recv, [debug_field, _], _) = &expr.kind | ||
| && let recv_ty = typeck_results.expr_ty(recv).peel_refs() | ||
| && match_type(cx, recv_ty, &paths::DEBUG_STRUCT) | ||
| && path.ident.name == sym::field | ||
| && let ExprKind::Lit(lit) = &debug_field.kind | ||
| && let LitKind::Str(sym, ..) = lit.node | ||
| { | ||
| Some(sym) | ||
| } else { | ||
| None | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| /// Attempts to find unused fields assuming that the item is a struct | ||
| fn check_struct<'tcx>( | ||
| cx: &LateContext<'tcx>, | ||
| typeck_results: &TypeckResults<'tcx>, | ||
| block: &'tcx Block<'tcx>, | ||
| self_ty: Ty<'tcx>, | ||
| item: &'tcx Item<'tcx>, | ||
| data: &VariantData<'_>, | ||
| ) { | ||
| // Is there a "direct" field access anywhere (i.e. self.foo)? | ||
| // We don't want to lint if there is not, because the user might have | ||
| // a newtype struct and use fields from the wrapped type only. | ||
| let mut has_direct_field_access = false; | ||
| let mut field_accesses = FxHashSet::default(); | ||
|
|
||
| for_each_expr(block, |expr| { | ||
| if let ExprKind::Field(target, ident) = expr.kind | ||
| && let target_ty = typeck_results.expr_ty_adjusted(target).peel_refs() | ||
| && target_ty == self_ty | ||
| { | ||
| field_accesses.insert(ident.name); | ||
| has_direct_field_access = true; | ||
| } else if let Some(sym) = as_field_call(cx, typeck_results, expr) { | ||
| field_accesses.insert(sym); | ||
| } | ||
| ControlFlow::<!, _>::Continue(()) | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| let span_notes = data | ||
| .fields() | ||
| .iter() | ||
| .filter_map(|field| { | ||
| if field_accesses.contains(&field.ident.name) || is_path_lang_item(cx, field.ty, LangItem::PhantomData) { | ||
| None | ||
| } else { | ||
| Some((field.span, "this field is unused")) | ||
| } | ||
| }) | ||
| .collect::<Vec<_>>(); | ||
|
|
||
| // only lint if there's also at least one direct field access to allow patterns | ||
| // where one might have a newtype struct and uses fields from the wrapped type | ||
| if !span_notes.is_empty() && has_direct_field_access { | ||
| report_lints(cx, item.span, span_notes); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| impl<'tcx> LateLintPass<'tcx> for MissingFieldsInDebug { | ||
| fn check_item(&mut self, cx: &LateContext<'tcx>, item: &'tcx rustc_hir::Item<'tcx>) { | ||
| // is this an `impl Debug for X` block? | ||
| if let ItemKind::Impl(Impl { of_trait: Some(trait_ref), self_ty, items, .. }) = item.kind | ||
| && let Res::Def(DefKind::Trait, trait_def_id) = trait_ref.path.res | ||
| && let TyKind::Path(QPath::Resolved(_, self_path)) = &self_ty.kind | ||
| && cx.match_def_path(trait_def_id, &[sym::core, sym::fmt, sym::Debug]) | ||
| // don't trigger if this impl was derived | ||
| && !cx.tcx.has_attr(item.owner_id, sym::automatically_derived) | ||
| && !item.span.from_expansion() | ||
| // find `Debug::fmt` function | ||
| && let Some(fmt_item) = items.iter().find(|i| i.ident.name == sym::fmt) | ||
| && let ImplItem { kind: ImplItemKind::Fn(_, body_id), .. } = cx.tcx.hir().impl_item(fmt_item.id) | ||
| && let body = cx.tcx.hir().body(*body_id) | ||
| && let ExprKind::Block(block, _) = body.value.kind | ||
| // inspect `self` | ||
| && let self_ty = cx.tcx.type_of(self_path.res.def_id()).0.peel_refs() | ||
| && let Some(self_adt) = self_ty.ty_adt_def() | ||
| && let Some(self_def_id) = self_adt.did().as_local() | ||
| && let Some(Node::Item(self_item)) = cx.tcx.hir().find_by_def_id(self_def_id) | ||
| // NB: can't call cx.typeck_results() as we are not in a body | ||
| && let typeck_results = cx.tcx.typeck_body(*body_id) | ||
| && should_lint(cx, typeck_results, block) | ||
| { | ||
| // we intentionally only lint structs, see lint description | ||
| if let ItemKind::Struct(data, _) = &self_item.kind { | ||
| check_struct(cx, typeck_results, block, self_ty, item, data); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.